<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jury finds Samsung willfully violated Apple patents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:48:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: G4Dualie</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1027639</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[G4Dualie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1027639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pat go back and read the part where you describe Apple as having lost Samsung as a partner.

When did Apple announce they were cutting business ties with Samsung? How do you explain that statement?

In my world, Samsung and Apple agree to disagree, but desire a shared licensing experience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat go back and read the part where you describe Apple as having lost Samsung as a partner.</p>
<p>When did Apple announce they were cutting business ties with Samsung? How do you explain that statement?</p>
<p>In my world, Samsung and Apple agree to disagree, but desire a shared licensing experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G4Dualie</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1027627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[G4Dualie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1027627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pat, Samsung Mobile represents a very small percentage of profits for Samsung&#039;s parent company and even though they are the largest cell phone maker in the world, all that has changed.

Samsung has only heightened the Asian propensity to lift critical design elements from others&#039;s good works.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat, Samsung Mobile represents a very small percentage of profits for Samsung&#8217;s parent company and even though they are the largest cell phone maker in the world, all that has changed.</p>
<p>Samsung has only heightened the Asian propensity to lift critical design elements from others&#8217;s good works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G4Dualie</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1027614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[G4Dualie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1027614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wow, I think Pat needs to work on their opening gambit.

&quot;This said, let the Appeals begin!&quot;

They have Pat, you just haven&#039;t responded.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, I think Pat needs to work on their opening gambit.</p>
<p>&#8220;This said, let the Appeals begin!&#8221;</p>
<p>They have Pat, you just haven&#8217;t responded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G4Dualie</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1027611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[G4Dualie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1027611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It only took one football fan to cross the court. 

Makes you wonder why they never caught Nichole Brown Simpson&#039;s murderer? OJ didn&#039;t do it, and was covering up for someone else, but the jury let him off anyway, so now the real murderer can live the rest of &quot;HIS&quot; life in peace.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It only took one football fan to cross the court. </p>
<p>Makes you wonder why they never caught Nichole Brown Simpson&#8217;s murderer? OJ didn&#8217;t do it, and was covering up for someone else, but the jury let him off anyway, so now the real murderer can live the rest of &#8220;HIS&#8221; life in peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-5/#comment-1027291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1027291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Snoop Dog owns a LOT of Samsung products if Snoop Dog owns Apple products as Samsung provides Apple with up to 60% of it&#039;s components throughout all the Apple platforms.  Cnet just tested SDD and yes once again Samsung simply crushes everyone else hence why Apple and Samsung will continue to be joined at the hips for some time to come.

Oh by the way Snoop Dog, Samsung components can be found is almost every electronic gadget including cars, appliances (Non Samsung), etc..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snoop Dog owns a LOT of Samsung products if Snoop Dog owns Apple products as Samsung provides Apple with up to 60% of it&#8217;s components throughout all the Apple platforms.  Cnet just tested SDD and yes once again Samsung simply crushes everyone else hence why Apple and Samsung will continue to be joined at the hips for some time to come.</p>
<p>Oh by the way Snoop Dog, Samsung components can be found is almost every electronic gadget including cars, appliances (Non Samsung), etc..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-5/#comment-1027190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1027190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not at all?  Matter of fact based on how the American legal community is reacting to this, expect a complete about face from the California Courts as the Jury was ill prepared or equipped to render a judgement in such a complex case, the Foreman&#039;s comments will doom the verdict.  He talks too much and clearly has the verbosity to influence others as he apparently own a patent of his own and made it hard for him to not side with Apple.

All this to say, that I probably have more Apple products that  most of you on here hence my points about Samsung are not to discredit Apple but rather to draw attention to just how big of a stakeholder Samsung is within Apple.  If I ran Apple, I would of found a different way to do this.  This said, the Courts will be playing around with this case well into 2015 or so and Samsung will have launched their Galaxy S10 by then.

I enjoy getting Apple Cult members all wet and bothered as it is just a hoot!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not at all?  Matter of fact based on how the American legal community is reacting to this, expect a complete about face from the California Courts as the Jury was ill prepared or equipped to render a judgement in such a complex case, the Foreman&#8217;s comments will doom the verdict.  He talks too much and clearly has the verbosity to influence others as he apparently own a patent of his own and made it hard for him to not side with Apple.</p>
<p>All this to say, that I probably have more Apple products that  most of you on here hence my points about Samsung are not to discredit Apple but rather to draw attention to just how big of a stakeholder Samsung is within Apple.  If I ran Apple, I would of found a different way to do this.  This said, the Courts will be playing around with this case well into 2015 or so and Samsung will have launched their Galaxy S10 by then.</p>
<p>I enjoy getting Apple Cult members all wet and bothered as it is just a hoot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-5/#comment-1027126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tommy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 05:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1027126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about the Holden Barina and the Suzuki Swift? Same car, different badge. Where&#039;s the uproar?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the Holden Barina and the Suzuki Swift? Same car, different badge. Where&#8217;s the uproar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1027121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 03:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1027121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Open up each device and Samsung parts all in each of them.  Motherboard, gears, motors etc...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open up each device and Samsung parts all in each of them.  Motherboard, gears, motors etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Econ Tom</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1027013</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Econ Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1027013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interview, the jury foreman explained the basis for the 1 billion judgement was based on Samsung&#039;s &quot;12%&quot; profit margin, not the 30 to 35% margin estimated by Apple. First, it seems inconsistent to believe Samsung on this point given its dishonesty of massive proportion. Second, 12% seems unreasonably low from a general business perspective and given (a) Samsung&#039;s vertical integration and (b) reference to tear-down cost estimates made by people like iSuppli for various similar devices. (If Samsung does only show 12% margin in the USA, the remainder is offshore - but still represents ill-gotten gains which they should pay back to Apple.) The jury may have had good technical, logical, and engineering skills -- and I applaud their work -- but their business sense regarding profit margins may be weak. Nevertheless, margins can be fairly objectively estimated and perhaps the issue can be revisited. Samsung was found to infringe. (The judge can also triple damages, but first the damages should be correctly identified.) Samsung should disgorge all I&#039;ll-gotten profits. And they are welcome to increase consumer choice in the world by developing their own stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an interview, the jury foreman explained the basis for the 1 billion judgement was based on Samsung&#8217;s &#8220;12%&#8221; profit margin, not the 30 to 35% margin estimated by Apple. First, it seems inconsistent to believe Samsung on this point given its dishonesty of massive proportion. Second, 12% seems unreasonably low from a general business perspective and given (a) Samsung&#8217;s vertical integration and (b) reference to tear-down cost estimates made by people like iSuppli for various similar devices. (If Samsung does only show 12% margin in the USA, the remainder is offshore &#8211; but still represents ill-gotten gains which they should pay back to Apple.) The jury may have had good technical, logical, and engineering skills &#8212; and I applaud their work &#8212; but their business sense regarding profit margins may be weak. Nevertheless, margins can be fairly objectively estimated and perhaps the issue can be revisited. Samsung was found to infringe. (The judge can also triple damages, but first the damages should be correctly identified.) Samsung should disgorge all I&#8217;ll-gotten profits. And they are welcome to increase consumer choice in the world by developing their own stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1027010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1027010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Goog in trouble now , me thinks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goog in trouble now , me thinks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fscuttle</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-5/#comment-1026993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fscuttle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you been to the comments section on Huffpost? The Apple haters are buggin out. I&#039;m lovin it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you been to the comments section on Huffpost? The Apple haters are buggin out. I&#8217;m lovin it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: janekg</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-5/#comment-1026982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[janekg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice! ... Where to now Sammy? ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice! &#8230; Where to now Sammy? &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snoop dogg</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-5/#comment-1026980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snoop dogg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pat must be suicidal at hearing this dreadful news. I am so glad that I never owned a Samsung product and never will]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat must be suicidal at hearing this dreadful news. I am so glad that I never owned a Samsung product and never will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chefpastry</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-5/#comment-1026972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chefpastry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 07:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because they don&#039;t own the patents.  If they did, they would sue for sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because they don&#8217;t own the patents.  If they did, they would sue for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abdullah</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-4/#comment-1026971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdullah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 07:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This makes it official. Big difference.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes it official. Big difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C3PO</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C3PO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[boooo, Tim did what?
I think Scott did this one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>boooo, Tim did what?<br />
I think Scott did this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omega</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Omega]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nonsense, Pat. You forget the long queues for iPhones in China, which does not happen for Samsung phones!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nonsense, Pat. You forget the long queues for iPhones in China, which does not happen for Samsung phones!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Pill - is on crack</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Pill - is on crack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pat - best use a new id name...
freedom of thought 
isn&#039;t welcomed here apparently]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat &#8211; best use a new id name&#8230;<br />
freedom of thought<br />
isn&#8217;t welcomed here apparently</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Pill</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Pill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[unbelievable,

pat makes a rather simple comment and the everyone is on his ass... what happened to freedom of opinions ????

agree or not agree... far too many lemmings here]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unbelievable,</p>
<p>pat makes a rather simple comment and the everyone is on his ass&#8230; what happened to freedom of opinions ????</p>
<p>agree or not agree&#8230; far too many lemmings here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Pill</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Pill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nice KenC... lowering yourself to racial spit...
i understand you are looking at the corporate lawsuit not in terms of race or colour... your question is HOW asian are you Pat. Low blow dude.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice KenC&#8230; lowering yourself to racial spit&#8230;<br />
i understand you are looking at the corporate lawsuit not in terms of race or colour&#8230; your question is HOW asian are you Pat. Low blow dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Pill</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Pill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 05:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- commenting on Pats&#039; opinion in this regard is rather BS... can&#039;t see how his words have offended you &quot;althego&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- commenting on Pats&#8217; opinion in this regard is rather BS&#8230; can&#8217;t see how his words have offended you &#8220;althego&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Pill</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Pill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- a business lawyer is considered a &quot;armchair lawyer&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- a business lawyer is considered a &#8220;armchair lawyer&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Pill</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Pill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple best have a new partner.

The fact that Samsung, BACK STABBED Apple should have been clear enough for Apple to move on. However, Pat is correct. It&#039;s a major deal to replace Samsung.

I guess Apple will need to make better contracts with its partners it uses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple best have a new partner.</p>
<p>The fact that Samsung, BACK STABBED Apple should have been clear enough for Apple to move on. However, Pat is correct. It&#8217;s a major deal to replace Samsung.</p>
<p>I guess Apple will need to make better contracts with its partners it uses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Pill</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Pill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am with Pat here,

1) He hasn&#039;t made a negative comment.
2) Asian companies will unite
3) Apple invests 5 Billion to Samsung, the win deducts 1.5 for only 1 year... hopefully more punishment comes from this other then money in damages.

Apple needed to defend its UI here - and they did. However the bigger picture is with Apple&#039;s future suppliers. As I have mentioned before, Apple is still &quot;barking up the wrong tree&quot;, at least indirectly... the real EMEMY is in Apple&#039;s own backyard; Google. 

Android must die or be re-written so that it paralyzed to the point, where it is obvious to the consumers, that Android is inferior to iOS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with Pat here,</p>
<p>1) He hasn&#8217;t made a negative comment.<br />
2) Asian companies will unite<br />
3) Apple invests 5 Billion to Samsung, the win deducts 1.5 for only 1 year&#8230; hopefully more punishment comes from this other then money in damages.</p>
<p>Apple needed to defend its UI here &#8211; and they did. However the bigger picture is with Apple&#8217;s future suppliers. As I have mentioned before, Apple is still &#8220;barking up the wrong tree&#8221;, at least indirectly&#8230; the real EMEMY is in Apple&#8217;s own backyard; Google. </p>
<p>Android must die or be re-written so that it paralyzed to the point, where it is obvious to the consumers, that Android is inferior to iOS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Pill</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Pill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy with the news yet still I wish Apple was granted the 2.75 Million win.

Plus, all out world wide ban on Samsung Galaxy Smartphones and Tablets. Including all orders of Googles Nexus from Samsung. A ban until Google restricts the alteration of its freely distributed Android by other manufactures with a none-cloning agreement. Also to stripe out of Multi-Touch functionality, Bounce end of list, the Translucent Quicktime over lay controls etc... and more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy with the news yet still I wish Apple was granted the 2.75 Million win.</p>
<p>Plus, all out world wide ban on Samsung Galaxy Smartphones and Tablets. Including all orders of Googles Nexus from Samsung. A ban until Google restricts the alteration of its freely distributed Android by other manufactures with a none-cloning agreement. Also to stripe out of Multi-Touch functionality, Bounce end of list, the Translucent Quicktime over lay controls etc&#8230; and more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lordthree</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lordthree]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 02:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pats comments are more like &#039;monkey talks&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pats comments are more like &#8216;monkey talks&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lordthree</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026949</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lordthree]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 02:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I prefer limes]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer limes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ploth</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-5/#comment-1026948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ploth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 02:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a relief! Although this case seem so obvious, blatant, slavish, immoral and serial it seemed that the outcome may not be favourable.

If only Steve jobs could have lived to see the result. Hopefully this is the first in a long line of wins and maybe even a slowdown of the copying taking place.

Please Your Honor,, award triple damages and an import ban ASAP]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a relief! Although this case seem so obvious, blatant, slavish, immoral and serial it seemed that the outcome may not be favourable.</p>
<p>If only Steve jobs could have lived to see the result. Hopefully this is the first in a long line of wins and maybe even a slowdown of the copying taking place.</p>
<p>Please Your Honor,, award triple damages and an import ban ASAP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hannahjs</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026944</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hannahjs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And you are the first person on the Internet to correctly spell &quot;misspelled&quot;. Guess I would be the 2nd]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you are the first person on the Internet to correctly spell &#8220;misspelled&#8221;. Guess I would be the 2nd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hannahjs</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026943</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hannahjs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Been waiting since Pork Chop Hill]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been waiting since Pork Chop Hill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-5/#comment-1026940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darrel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love Apple but does this mean nobody is allowed to make anything remotely similar? I have two led torches at home. One by Arlec and one by Tomcat, they&#039;re identical. Why don&#039;t car companies or fridge makers sue eachother?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Apple but does this mean nobody is allowed to make anything remotely similar? I have two led torches at home. One by Arlec and one by Tomcat, they&#8217;re identical. Why don&#8217;t car companies or fridge makers sue eachother?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coal Cracker</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-5/#comment-1026935</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coal Cracker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congrats Apple!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats Apple!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ploth</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-5/#comment-1026932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ploth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 23:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a relief! As blatant as this case seemed...

Such a shame Steve wasn&#039;t around to see it, hopefully the first of a run of wins and a maybe even a move away from copying(!)

Please judge, triple the award - it was wilful, blatant, slavish and serial.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a relief! As blatant as this case seemed&#8230;</p>
<p>Such a shame Steve wasn&#8217;t around to see it, hopefully the first of a run of wins and a maybe even a move away from copying(!)</p>
<p>Please judge, triple the award &#8211; it was wilful, blatant, slavish and serial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ploth</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ploth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately it&#039;s highly unlikely...unless he threw away his belief of self-goodness and trusted in Jesus, he needed to see any victories while alive to be smile worthy. 
Such a shame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately it&#8217;s highly unlikely&#8230;unless he threw away his belief of self-goodness and trusted in Jesus, he needed to see any victories while alive to be smile worthy.<br />
Such a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ploth</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026929</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ploth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve&#039;s obsessions in this life ended when he died...unfortunately it would seem he will never smile again. 

He will find out the difference between a beautiful phone and a perfect God]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve&#8217;s obsessions in this life ended when he died&#8230;unfortunately it would seem he will never smile again. </p>
<p>He will find out the difference between a beautiful phone and a perfect God</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ploth</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ploth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally a conversational interaction Steve would loose handsomely...

&#039;well I&#039;m the guy who saved the world and keeps it running. The only one who was able to save you&#039; 

Alas his entrance into God&#039;s house would not have been allowed no matter his genius status, net savings, good deeds or product list. No one can exist in the presence of Holy God without Jesus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally a conversational interaction Steve would loose handsomely&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8216;well I&#8217;m the guy who saved the world and keeps it running. The only one who was able to save you&#8217; </p>
<p>Alas his entrance into God&#8217;s house would not have been allowed no matter his genius status, net savings, good deeds or product list. No one can exist in the presence of Holy God without Jesus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-5/#comment-1026919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it not google that is in trouble now?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it not google that is in trouble now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nightfly</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-3/#comment-1026917</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nightfly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was Friday, some of us do have a night live. Beside I heard the about Apple victory around 7pm and gave me more of an excuse to go out and celabrate. I quickly made a comment and want out to party.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was Friday, some of us do have a night live. Beside I heard the about Apple victory around 7pm and gave me more of an excuse to go out and celabrate. I quickly made a comment and want out to party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nightfly</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-2/#comment-1026916</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nightfly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 21:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could not  agree more. I am Chinese and my parents who survied the WW2 as kids still do not like the Japanese. They gotten over most of it but you can still hear the bitterness in their voice at times. As for me I was call a Korean  today by some non-asian lady, I nicely correct her. I got to start losing some weight. As for Pat I have no F**king idea what he talking about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could not  agree more. I am Chinese and my parents who survied the WW2 as kids still do not like the Japanese. They gotten over most of it but you can still hear the bitterness in their voice at times. As for me I was call a Korean  today by some non-asian lady, I nicely correct her. I got to start losing some weight. As for Pat I have no F**king idea what he talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Check</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reality Check]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@gmak:  GDP is the measure of how a country uses its resources.  It&#039;s irrelevant what resources you have if you don&#039;t use them...  Duh.

@Zeke:  I&#039;m not here to defend Pat&#039;s comments.  I&#039;m talking cold economics, never suggested the Chinese would need to invade the US to see its downfall.  It&#039;s fiscal policies and national hubris can achieve that without any military involvement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@gmak:  GDP is the measure of how a country uses its resources.  It&#8217;s irrelevant what resources you have if you don&#8217;t use them&#8230;  Duh.</p>
<p>@Zeke:  I&#8217;m not here to defend Pat&#8217;s comments.  I&#8217;m talking cold economics, never suggested the Chinese would need to invade the US to see its downfall.  It&#8217;s fiscal policies and national hubris can achieve that without any military involvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iCupertino</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-5/#comment-1026908</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iCupertino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American troop should pull out from Samsung-South-Korea and let North Korea do whatever they want with it... That&#039;s should teach The Country of Samsung-South-Korea a lesson.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American troop should pull out from Samsung-South-Korea and let North Korea do whatever they want with it&#8230; That&#8217;s should teach The Country of Samsung-South-Korea a lesson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-4/#comment-1026906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Me tooooooooooo!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me tooooooooooo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silverhawk1</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-4/#comment-1026904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverhawk1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 19:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to have a reputation in order to lose a reputation.
My 2 cents.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to have a reputation in order to lose a reputation.<br />
My 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twilightmoon</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026903</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[twilightmoon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The iPad is made in the US.

There is some low level assembly that takes place in various parts of Asia by Foxconn, and Samsung and other suppliers make certain component parts.

The critical part happens here. The design phase with the high paid engineers, software and hardware, the designers, along with software architecture APIs, cloud computing components.

Everything of real value is created in the US.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The iPad is made in the US.</p>
<p>There is some low level assembly that takes place in various parts of Asia by Foxconn, and Samsung and other suppliers make certain component parts.</p>
<p>The critical part happens here. The design phase with the high paid engineers, software and hardware, the designers, along with software architecture APIs, cloud computing components.</p>
<p>Everything of real value is created in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoC</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BoC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I should have made a better point with details.

They can get sold a lemon once, but after that, they have the score and will not buy crap again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have made a better point with details.</p>
<p>They can get sold a lemon once, but after that, they have the score and will not buy crap again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil Bates</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-1026897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gil Bates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1

In fact, Samsung has far more to lose by being barred from selling their phones during the appeals process then just biting the bullet and trying to reach some kind of settlement with Apple in the meantime.

Whether Apple wants to settle... well, that&#039;s another question.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1</p>
<p>In fact, Samsung has far more to lose by being barred from selling their phones during the appeals process then just biting the bullet and trying to reach some kind of settlement with Apple in the meantime.</p>
<p>Whether Apple wants to settle&#8230; well, that&#8217;s another question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GmanMac</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-4/#comment-1026894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GmanMac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has nothing to do with race. It&#039;s about a culture that thinks it&#039;s ok to eat magnificent companion animals like dogs. Likely same cultural values that think it&#039;s Ok to blatantly ripoff Apple&#039;s Blood Sweat and Tears. 

BTW the Swiss regularly eat dogs too. They are pond scum for doing it and their society /culture for allowing it..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has nothing to do with race. It&#8217;s about a culture that thinks it&#8217;s ok to eat magnificent companion animals like dogs. Likely same cultural values that think it&#8217;s Ok to blatantly ripoff Apple&#8217;s Blood Sweat and Tears. </p>
<p>BTW the Swiss regularly eat dogs too. They are pond scum for doing it and their society /culture for allowing it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vega51</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-4/#comment-1026890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vega51]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LMAO.  &quot;BOOM, goes the dynamite!&quot;. Why is that so funny!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMAO.  &#8220;BOOM, goes the dynamite!&#8221;. Why is that so funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BH</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-4/#comment-1026888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 17:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not about race Ahole]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not about race Ahole</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HTML5 Gordon</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/24/jury-finds-samsung-violated-apple-patents/comment-page-3/#comment-1026887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HTML5 Gordon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 17:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=88567#comment-1026887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Apple&#039;s statement said:

&quot;The lawsuits between Apple and Samsung were about much more than patents or money.  They were about values...&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Apple&#8217;s statement said:</p>
<p>&#8220;The lawsuits between Apple and Samsung were about much more than patents or money.  They were about values&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
