<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung stock slides after resting patent infringement case v. Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/17/samsung-stock-slides-after-resting-patent-infringement-case-v-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/17/samsung-stock-slides-after-resting-patent-infringement-case-v-apple/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:23:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/17/samsung-stock-slides-after-resting-patent-infringement-case-v-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-1022760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[me]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 07:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87999#comment-1022760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[whoever owns stock in samsung rode the short-bus to school...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whoever owns stock in samsung rode the short-bus to school&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gypsy</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/17/samsung-stock-slides-after-resting-patent-infringement-case-v-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-1022430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gypsy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 18:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87999#comment-1022430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes.   A shot above a spinning  whirlpool;    &#039;As the Turd Turns&quot;

Should be the Samsung logo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.   A shot above a spinning  whirlpool;    &#8216;As the Turd Turns&#8221;</p>
<p>Should be the Samsung logo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omalansky</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/17/samsung-stock-slides-after-resting-patent-infringement-case-v-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-1022319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[omalansky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87999#comment-1022319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stay tuned for the next exciting episode of &quot;As the Toilet Flushes&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stay tuned for the next exciting episode of &#8220;As the Toilet Flushes&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twimoon1</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/17/samsung-stock-slides-after-resting-patent-infringement-case-v-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-1022307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[twimoon1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87999#comment-1022307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[+1]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grwisher</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/17/samsung-stock-slides-after-resting-patent-infringement-case-v-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-1022217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grwisher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87999#comment-1022217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been trying to understand what is the meaning of her statement. I know it is customary for the judge to urge the parties to the case to settle all along the way, but does this statement mean that possibly both will lose? I don&#039;t see how that is possible. I do think it is highly likely that the winning party will not get everything that they are after if that is what she means.

From many accounts, Apple has already achieved a great deal of what they wanted in that SameSung has eliminated many of the legal problems in their new products. Apple just wanted to stop the slavish copying from SameSung and deter all others from doing so as well. If they get anything besides what they have accomplished, it is just icing on the cake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been trying to understand what is the meaning of her statement. I know it is customary for the judge to urge the parties to the case to settle all along the way, but does this statement mean that possibly both will lose? I don&#8217;t see how that is possible. I do think it is highly likely that the winning party will not get everything that they are after if that is what she means.</p>
<p>From many accounts, Apple has already achieved a great deal of what they wanted in that SameSung has eliminated many of the legal problems in their new products. Apple just wanted to stop the slavish copying from SameSung and deter all others from doing so as well. If they get anything besides what they have accomplished, it is just icing on the cake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lochias</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/17/samsung-stock-slides-after-resting-patent-infringement-case-v-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-1022202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lochias]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87999#comment-1022202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twice 3.7% ?  That&#039;s 45 or so dollars a share.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twice 3.7% ?  That&#8217;s 45 or so dollars a share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wozniyack</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/17/samsung-stock-slides-after-resting-patent-infringement-case-v-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-1022193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wozniyack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87999#comment-1022193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple will probably be punished in the trial results as well. Remember, the judge said BOTH sides have risk if it goes to verdict.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple will probably be punished in the trial results as well. Remember, the judge said BOTH sides have risk if it goes to verdict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krquet</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/17/samsung-stock-slides-after-resting-patent-infringement-case-v-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-1022175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[krquet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87999#comment-1022175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meh; on any given perplexing day Jobs would sneeze and AAPL would shed twice that amount in a session.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh; on any given perplexing day Jobs would sneeze and AAPL would shed twice that amount in a session.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy boy</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/17/samsung-stock-slides-after-resting-patent-infringement-case-v-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-1022168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tommy boy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87999#comment-1022168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like the investors have come back with their verdict on this case before it even goes to the jury.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the investors have come back with their verdict on this case before it even goes to the jury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enzos</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/17/samsung-stock-slides-after-resting-patent-infringement-case-v-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-1022163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[enzos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87999#comment-1022163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;manufacturer of Apple-designed chips for iPhones and iPads&quot; .. and of Apple-designed phones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;manufacturer of Apple-designed chips for iPhones and iPads&#8221; .. and of Apple-designed phones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: japanscott</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/17/samsung-stock-slides-after-resting-patent-infringement-case-v-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-1022159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[japanscott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87999#comment-1022159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karma.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/17/samsung-stock-slides-after-resting-patent-infringement-case-v-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-1022158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Victor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87999#comment-1022158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even their shareholders are disgusted at their shameful plagiarism]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even their shareholders are disgusted at their shameful plagiarism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
