<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple patent applications reveal iMovie and Final Cut Pro X innovations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/16/apple-patent-applications-reveal-imovie-and-final-cut-pro-x-innovations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/16/apple-patent-applications-reveal-imovie-and-final-cut-pro-x-innovations/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:57:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrmonkeyandy</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/16/apple-patent-applications-reveal-imovie-and-final-cut-pro-x-innovations/comment-page-1/#comment-1023206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mrmonkeyandy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87959#comment-1023206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whilst I love apple products. I teach media using the gear, I think they have dropped the ball with final cut pro x. I love the interface, the way it works and the simplicity. But from my perspective, the major missing feature is proper network support. I know you can add SAN drives but, why not network folders, like the previous version and premiere? 

Working in an environment like this is impossible. The only way we can store students work on networks properly is by using disk images which screw up all the time. The software is also still far too buggy for professional environments. The amount of times I have encountered corrupt projects and backups is stupid. 

The software has major potential and I do love it. But working in an environment with software that doesn&#039;t screw up work randomly is more important to me. They are making improvements with each update. But there are major missing features and too many bugs still. I hope it gets sorted because I want to use this software and for it to work properly! It has massive potential.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst I love apple products. I teach media using the gear, I think they have dropped the ball with final cut pro x. I love the interface, the way it works and the simplicity. But from my perspective, the major missing feature is proper network support. I know you can add SAN drives but, why not network folders, like the previous version and premiere? </p>
<p>Working in an environment like this is impossible. The only way we can store students work on networks properly is by using disk images which screw up all the time. The software is also still far too buggy for professional environments. The amount of times I have encountered corrupt projects and backups is stupid. </p>
<p>The software has major potential and I do love it. But working in an environment with software that doesn&#8217;t screw up work randomly is more important to me. They are making improvements with each update. But there are major missing features and too many bugs still. I hope it gets sorted because I want to use this software and for it to work properly! It has massive potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessellator</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/16/apple-patent-applications-reveal-imovie-and-final-cut-pro-x-innovations/comment-page-1/#comment-1022230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tessellator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87959#comment-1022230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolute nonsense, we run it all the time (on many different machines) now and virtually never see  the system busy ball.

My guess is that you are VM swapping to satisfy malloc calls (memory allocation requests). This is normally the result of too little physical ram and or too many running applications and is particularly bad on applications with constant media needs (ie disk data access)  Lion and mountain lion have far more VM persistence (makes them &quot;snappier&quot; when launching) which requires more physical ram. Shouldn&#039;t really be a problem in this day and age where RAM is dirt cheep (see crucial.com)

At any rate if you are legitimate, No, this is not normal behavior FCPX is an amazing application, groundbreaking. Truly next generation. It is what all editors will be like in 5 years (yes I know avid and adobe are poo-poo&#039;ing now but remember that samesung and goooogle also poo poo&#039;d siri as useless and &quot;you should talk to other people not to you phone&quot; right up until they cloned it.
However it is going to be a long time before anyone can match FCPX&#039;s &quot;story centric&quot; magnetic timeline and real time operation. 

And if you are another of the Adobe/Avid trolls, Eff off, think about what you are attempting to do... Keep people away from the best story editing tool available today, at any price.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolute nonsense, we run it all the time (on many different machines) now and virtually never see  the system busy ball.</p>
<p>My guess is that you are VM swapping to satisfy malloc calls (memory allocation requests). This is normally the result of too little physical ram and or too many running applications and is particularly bad on applications with constant media needs (ie disk data access)  Lion and mountain lion have far more VM persistence (makes them &#8220;snappier&#8221; when launching) which requires more physical ram. Shouldn&#8217;t really be a problem in this day and age where RAM is dirt cheep (see crucial.com)</p>
<p>At any rate if you are legitimate, No, this is not normal behavior FCPX is an amazing application, groundbreaking. Truly next generation. It is what all editors will be like in 5 years (yes I know avid and adobe are poo-poo&#8217;ing now but remember that samesung and goooogle also poo poo&#8217;d siri as useless and &#8220;you should talk to other people not to you phone&#8221; right up until they cloned it.<br />
However it is going to be a long time before anyone can match FCPX&#8217;s &#8220;story centric&#8221; magnetic timeline and real time operation. </p>
<p>And if you are another of the Adobe/Avid trolls, Eff off, think about what you are attempting to do&#8230; Keep people away from the best story editing tool available today, at any price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph M</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/16/apple-patent-applications-reveal-imovie-and-final-cut-pro-x-innovations/comment-page-1/#comment-1022160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ralph M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87959#comment-1022160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Ray: I use FCPX on Apple&#039;s least expensive computer - a 2011 Mac mini - and I don&#039;t iexperience the problem you cite. Perhaps you should reinstall. Either that, or lose the attitude...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ray: I use FCPX on Apple&#8217;s least expensive computer &#8211; a 2011 Mac mini &#8211; and I don&#8217;t iexperience the problem you cite. Perhaps you should reinstall. Either that, or lose the attitude&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray The Video Guy</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/16/apple-patent-applications-reveal-imovie-and-final-cut-pro-x-innovations/comment-page-1/#comment-1022114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray The Video Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87959#comment-1022114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patent #1 for FCP X:  A new technology that makes FCP X usable and removes the 10 minute beach balls between each move you make.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patent #1 for FCP X:  A new technology that makes FCP X usable and removes the 10 minute beach balls between each move you make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hg Wells</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/16/apple-patent-applications-reveal-imovie-and-final-cut-pro-x-innovations/comment-page-1/#comment-1022053</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hg Wells]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87959#comment-1022053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope more people are realizing FCPX is a legitimate editing ap.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope more people are realizing FCPX is a legitimate editing ap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sum Jung Gai</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/16/apple-patent-applications-reveal-imovie-and-final-cut-pro-x-innovations/comment-page-1/#comment-1021862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sum Jung Gai]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87959#comment-1021862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heheh, “Andy Ubillos.”

Poor Randy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heheh, “Andy Ubillos.”</p>
<p>Poor Randy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metryq</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/16/apple-patent-applications-reveal-imovie-and-final-cut-pro-x-innovations/comment-page-1/#comment-1021844</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[metryq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87959#comment-1021844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be great to see all our favorite Apple products upgraded on a regular basis. Perhaps Apple is being overwhelmed by their own success—still not big enough to do everything that needs doing without sacrificing quality. Compare the number of employees in development at Microsoft with those at Apple, and then compare the quality of the products. 

As a long time Apple fan, it is easy to take miracles for granted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great to see all our favorite Apple products upgraded on a regular basis. Perhaps Apple is being overwhelmed by their own success—still not big enough to do everything that needs doing without sacrificing quality. Compare the number of employees in development at Microsoft with those at Apple, and then compare the quality of the products. </p>
<p>As a long time Apple fan, it is easy to take miracles for granted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metryq</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/16/apple-patent-applications-reveal-imovie-and-final-cut-pro-x-innovations/comment-page-1/#comment-1021839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[metryq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87959#comment-1021839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh no, Final Cut is dead! Apple doesn&#039;t care about professionals anymore. I&#039;m going to Avid! /sarc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no, Final Cut is dead! Apple doesn&#8217;t care about professionals anymore. I&#8217;m going to Avid! /sarc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maccheech</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/08/16/apple-patent-applications-reveal-imovie-and-final-cut-pro-x-innovations/comment-page-1/#comment-1021835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[maccheech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=87959#comment-1021835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iMovie and Aperture have seen many innovations and upgrades throughout the years, and that is quite fine. But what about burning midnight oil on iWork? It would be nice to have a revamp Keynote, Numbers and Pages, when was the latest innovations for those apps?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iMovie and Aperture have seen many innovations and upgrades throughout the years, and that is quite fine. But what about burning midnight oil on iWork? It would be nice to have a revamp Keynote, Numbers and Pages, when was the latest innovations for those apps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
