<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No, Mr. President, the government did not create the Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Harper</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1019504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Harper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1019504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t you know that the Internet is the same as Ethernet, LOL. The author of this article is a moron. Probably a Republican too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you know that the Internet is the same as Ethernet, LOL. The author of this article is a moron. Probably a Republican too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mic</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1013551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1013551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you read a different story than the rest of us then Mike?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you read a different story than the rest of us then Mike?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techdoozyblog</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-4/#comment-1012940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[techdoozyblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 02:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1012940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://techdoozyblog.wordpress.com/2012/07/31/57/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tech Doozy Blog&lt;/a&gt; and commented: 
Sometimes the ignorance of those in powerful positions can be amusing. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://techdoozyblog.wordpress.com/2012/07/31/57/" rel="nofollow">Tech Doozy Blog</a> and commented:<br />
Sometimes the ignorance of those in powerful positions can be amusing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krazy Katt</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-4/#comment-1012014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krazy Katt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1012014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m late to the party, But I want to ask MDN why were they willing to lose geek cred by asserting what we all know to be false?

The only defense of this garbage are the posts talking about how much they don&#039;t like Obama. Pretty telling.

It didn&#039;t take long for reality to seep in. and the truth be told.

Damn, MDN boys, are you so hateful of our President that you are willing to drop your own credibility as tech people to try &amp; spew a lie that we all know is partisan crap???

You leach off of other writer&#039;s work, and you have no integrity beyond your alliance to a political ideology that requires you to re-write recent history. Great Job.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m late to the party, But I want to ask MDN why were they willing to lose geek cred by asserting what we all know to be false?</p>
<p>The only defense of this garbage are the posts talking about how much they don&#8217;t like Obama. Pretty telling.</p>
<p>It didn&#8217;t take long for reality to seep in. and the truth be told.</p>
<p>Damn, MDN boys, are you so hateful of our President that you are willing to drop your own credibility as tech people to try &amp; spew a lie that we all know is partisan crap???</p>
<p>You leach off of other writer&#8217;s work, and you have no integrity beyond your alliance to a political ideology that requires you to re-write recent history. Great Job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikatomuirhead</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-4/#comment-1011348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nikatomuirhead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 04:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1011348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57479781-93/no-credit-for-uncle-sam-in-creating-net-vint-cerf-disagrees/

Vint Cerf  was there, watching it all develop. He says quite plainly that the  U.S Government started the project.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57479781-93/no-credit-for-uncle-sam-in-creating-net-vint-cerf-disagrees/" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57479781-93/no-credit-for-uncle-sam-in-creating-net-vint-cerf-disagrees/</a></p>
<p>Vint Cerf  was there, watching it all develop. He says quite plainly that the  U.S Government started the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geoffsauer</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-3/#comment-1010456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geoffsauer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So does _Ars Technica_:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/wsj-mangles-history-to-argue-government-didnt-launch-the-internet/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does _Ars Technica_:<br />
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/wsj-mangles-history-to-argue-government-didnt-launch-the-internet/" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/wsj-mangles-history-to-argue-government-didnt-launch-the-internet/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misterME</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1010440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[misterME]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really? It&#039;s a good thing we aren&#039;t Germany, or I bet you&#039;d find a way to justify the Holocaust...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? It&#8217;s a good thing we aren&#8217;t Germany, or I bet you&#8217;d find a way to justify the Holocaust&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quiviran</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1010434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[quiviran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t recall anything about the government owning the means of production in my post. I just object to corporations being allowed to masquerade as persons while not adhering to similar rules. I did notice an absence of response to two concrete examples of corporate bad behavior going unpunished. I&#039;m guessing you&#039;re getting paid by the number of times you use &quot;Obama&quot; and &quot;socialist&quot; in the same sentence. Good luck in your career.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t recall anything about the government owning the means of production in my post. I just object to corporations being allowed to masquerade as persons while not adhering to similar rules. I did notice an absence of response to two concrete examples of corporate bad behavior going unpunished. I&#8217;m guessing you&#8217;re getting paid by the number of times you use &#8220;Obama&#8221; and &#8220;socialist&#8221; in the same sentence. Good luck in your career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohandy1</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1010319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ohandy1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joel, Thanks for the kind words but remember the law of unintended consequences usually works best through bureaucracy.   I&#039;d focus on the politicians.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel, Thanks for the kind words but remember the law of unintended consequences usually works best through bureaucracy.   I&#8217;d focus on the politicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohandy1</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1010310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ohandy1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are special.   (just a touch of condescension because it&#039;s you)

I don&#039;t think I&#039;m exceptionally brilliant, I just don&#039;t think this is very complicated.

Your logic is so poor I don&#039;t have room to help you here.  Besides, it has nothing to do with how socialist Obama is.  I expect you want all corporations to go away and the &quot;people&quot; own all means of production. Because that works so well in communist China, Cuba, Venezuela.  Even overthrowing the terrible government of South  Africa by communists led to far greater poverty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are special.   (just a touch of condescension because it&#8217;s you)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m exceptionally brilliant, I just don&#8217;t think this is very complicated.</p>
<p>Your logic is so poor I don&#8217;t have room to help you here.  Besides, it has nothing to do with how socialist Obama is.  I expect you want all corporations to go away and the &#8220;people&#8221; own all means of production. Because that works so well in communist China, Cuba, Venezuela.  Even overthrowing the terrible government of South  Africa by communists led to far greater poverty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessellator</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1010306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tessellator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually we have been pouring money into infrastructure as a part of the &quot;stimulus package&quot; Spending money like a drunken solder. This for the most part has not been spent wisely. Rather, it was spent on projects that were &quot;ready to spend now&quot; rather than the projects that desperately needed to be done  (worst condition) or that would have benefited the most people. Neither was accomplished and yet a huge sum of money was expended on &quot;infrastructure&quot;

I think we needed to stop that madness (as did my longtime friend who is a high level manager in a state DOT) as our infrastructure is crumbling and the waste was unforgivable. The stimulus was just pouring water onto the ground, in an attempt to make it rain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually we have been pouring money into infrastructure as a part of the &#8220;stimulus package&#8221; Spending money like a drunken solder. This for the most part has not been spent wisely. Rather, it was spent on projects that were &#8220;ready to spend now&#8221; rather than the projects that desperately needed to be done  (worst condition) or that would have benefited the most people. Neither was accomplished and yet a huge sum of money was expended on &#8220;infrastructure&#8221;</p>
<p>I think we needed to stop that madness (as did my longtime friend who is a high level manager in a state DOT) as our infrastructure is crumbling and the waste was unforgivable. The stimulus was just pouring water onto the ground, in an attempt to make it rain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjr001</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-4/#comment-1010289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bjr001]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican facts, ie, lies.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/07/23/wsjs-crovitz-creating-the-internet-and-getting/187284]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican facts, ie, lies.</p>
<p><a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/07/23/wsjs-crovitz-creating-the-internet-and-getting/187284" rel="nofollow">http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/07/23/wsjs-crovitz-creating-the-internet-and-getting/187284</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quiviran</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1010247</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[quiviran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beware of political writers pretending to know some actual facts. Ethernet is a data communication standard, IEEE 802.3 to be precise. Xerox may well have been part of the committee that developed the standard, but they hardly own it. 

Crovitz and the WSJ are part of News Corp now and are just contributors to the &quot;Obama gets everything wrong&quot; chorus. The corrupting influence of money corrodes everything and the WSJ is no exception. You don&#039;t have to be on TV to jump the shark.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beware of political writers pretending to know some actual facts. Ethernet is a data communication standard, IEEE 802.3 to be precise. Xerox may well have been part of the committee that developed the standard, but they hardly own it. </p>
<p>Crovitz and the WSJ are part of News Corp now and are just contributors to the &#8220;Obama gets everything wrong&#8221; chorus. The corrupting influence of money corrodes everything and the WSJ is no exception. You don&#8217;t have to be on TV to jump the shark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeL</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1010212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JoeL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ohandy1: Yours is one of the best opinions I have read on this controversial war between Democrats and Republicans. I do agree with most of what you write, but I think that, in these times, the balance is tilted toward the corporate dominance. My opinion is that a bit more government regulation should help reduce the abuse of those companies (and unscrupulous characters on the private sector). I think the balance needs to be adjusted very finely from time to time between corrupt politicians and corrupt CEOs]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ohandy1: Yours is one of the best opinions I have read on this controversial war between Democrats and Republicans. I do agree with most of what you write, but I think that, in these times, the balance is tilted toward the corporate dominance. My opinion is that a bit more government regulation should help reduce the abuse of those companies (and unscrupulous characters on the private sector). I think the balance needs to be adjusted very finely from time to time between corrupt politicians and corrupt CEOs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnacle</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-4/#comment-1010175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barnacle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 05:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, yes it did. This article has been debunked by Scientific American, and the author&#039;s own sources:

&quot;But perhaps the most damning rebuttal comes from Michael Hiltzik, the author “Dealers of Lightning,” a history of Xerox PARC that Crovitz uses as his main source for material. “While I’m gratified in a sense that he cites my book,” writes Hiltzik, “it’s my duty to point out that he’s wrong. My book bolsters, not contradicts, the argument that the Internet had its roots in the ARPANet, a government project.”

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2012/07/23/yes-government-researchers-really-did-invent-the-internet/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, yes it did. This article has been debunked by Scientific American, and the author&#8217;s own sources:</p>
<p>&#8220;But perhaps the most damning rebuttal comes from Michael Hiltzik, the author “Dealers of Lightning,” a history of Xerox PARC that Crovitz uses as his main source for material. “While I’m gratified in a sense that he cites my book,” writes Hiltzik, “it’s my duty to point out that he’s wrong. My book bolsters, not contradicts, the argument that the Internet had its roots in the ARPANet, a government project.”</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2012/07/23/yes-government-researchers-really-did-invent-the-internet/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2012/07/23/yes-government-researchers-really-did-invent-the-internet/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quiviran</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1010167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[quiviran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 04:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, the tobacco industry did not willfully engage in actions that caused the death of real people? The auto industry did not decide it was less costly to allow people to die in cars with faulty fuel tanks than fix them? Corporations make decisions every day that it is better to kill people than impact their profits. If a real person made those conscious decisions to kill other real persons they would face the death penalty. Therefore, logic tells me corporations are not people, legal fantasy aside.

Government in America may have been &quot;of the people, by the people and for the people&quot; at one time. Seems now that it is &quot;of the dollar, by the dollar and for the dollar&quot;, thanks to the legislation from the bench of the Supreme Court. I doubt that genie is ever going back in the bottle.

I&#039;m going to share a hint with you, you&#039;re not as smart as you would like to believe, certainly not constrained by a factual view of the world. Your snotty attitude wears very thin, very quickly. But, since you think you are communicating with idiots, feel free to resume your usual aloofness.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, the tobacco industry did not willfully engage in actions that caused the death of real people? The auto industry did not decide it was less costly to allow people to die in cars with faulty fuel tanks than fix them? Corporations make decisions every day that it is better to kill people than impact their profits. If a real person made those conscious decisions to kill other real persons they would face the death penalty. Therefore, logic tells me corporations are not people, legal fantasy aside.</p>
<p>Government in America may have been &#8220;of the people, by the people and for the people&#8221; at one time. Seems now that it is &#8220;of the dollar, by the dollar and for the dollar&#8221;, thanks to the legislation from the bench of the Supreme Court. I doubt that genie is ever going back in the bottle.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to share a hint with you, you&#8217;re not as smart as you would like to believe, certainly not constrained by a factual view of the world. Your snotty attitude wears very thin, very quickly. But, since you think you are communicating with idiots, feel free to resume your usual aloofness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanderselover</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-4/#comment-1010157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sanderselover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 03:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Article in Scientific America (that political rag) that better explains what happened.

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2012/07/23/yes-government-researchers-really-did-invent-the-internet/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article in Scientific America (that political rag) that better explains what happened.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2012/07/23/yes-government-researchers-really-did-invent-the-internet/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2012/07/23/yes-government-researchers-really-did-invent-the-internet/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnny Tahoe</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1010140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnny Tahoe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 03:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You sure are into &quot;reigns&quot; aren&#039;t you?  As in the &quot;reign of terror&quot; caused by your 1 per centers.

Oh, that&#039;s right, you meant &quot;rein&quot; as in what&#039;s used with horses.  My bad.  I was under the false assumption that the 1% could actually write something intelligent.

When it rains, it pours.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sure are into &#8220;reigns&#8221; aren&#8217;t you?  As in the &#8220;reign of terror&#8221; caused by your 1 per centers.</p>
<p>Oh, that&#8217;s right, you meant &#8220;rein&#8221; as in what&#8217;s used with horses.  My bad.  I was under the false assumption that the 1% could actually write something intelligent.</p>
<p>When it rains, it pours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohandy1</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1010130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ohandy1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 02:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[brilliantly put.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brilliantly put.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ohandy1</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1010122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ohandy1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 02:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sorry this wasn&#039;t written for a 4th grade level.  

Corporations are legal entities which are owned and operated by real people.  The legal entity is legally treated as a person for lack of a better definition because it doesn&#039;t exist without people in control of it.

I have never heard of the legal paperwork killing a court clerk by papercut so why worry about executing one?  

Now what is your understanding of government? is that a disembodied entity in your understanding also or do you understand that it is run by people?  People capable of the same self interest motivations as corporate execs.  

Crawl out of your shell.  There is a whole world of knowledge available to you if you just look.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry this wasn&#8217;t written for a 4th grade level.  </p>
<p>Corporations are legal entities which are owned and operated by real people.  The legal entity is legally treated as a person for lack of a better definition because it doesn&#8217;t exist without people in control of it.</p>
<p>I have never heard of the legal paperwork killing a court clerk by papercut so why worry about executing one?  </p>
<p>Now what is your understanding of government? is that a disembodied entity in your understanding also or do you understand that it is run by people?  People capable of the same self interest motivations as corporate execs.  </p>
<p>Crawl out of your shell.  There is a whole world of knowledge available to you if you just look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessellator</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1010113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tessellator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 02:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike are you really that obtuse or are you just playing dumb to attempt to prove a point?

S-corp are personally held companies (small businesses) they are not faceless entities, they are bob&#039;s auto repair down the street. That kind of corporation is a person, because an s-corp by definition is a personal corp (all profits are assumed (and taxed) personally)
All large corporations are c-corps (because of the laws limiting S-corps) privately held c-corps (i.e. above small business) exist but they are exceedingly rare.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike are you really that obtuse or are you just playing dumb to attempt to prove a point?</p>
<p>S-corp are personally held companies (small businesses) they are not faceless entities, they are bob&#8217;s auto repair down the street. That kind of corporation is a person, because an s-corp by definition is a personal corp (all profits are assumed (and taxed) personally)<br />
All large corporations are c-corps (because of the laws limiting S-corps) privately held c-corps (i.e. above small business) exist but they are exceedingly rare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Currie</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1010066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Currie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;We fix the Mistake of ’08 on November 6th.&lt;/i&gt;

...By reinstituting the Mistake of &#039;00. Aren&#039;t we brilliant.

We&#039;re all fracked ladies and gentlemen. Shot by both sides.

Enter the third parties...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We fix the Mistake of ’08 on November 6th.</i></p>
<p>&#8230;By reinstituting the Mistake of &#8217;00. Aren&#8217;t we brilliant.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re all fracked ladies and gentlemen. Shot by both sides.</p>
<p>Enter the third parties&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quiviran</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1010011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[quiviran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Verbose nonsense remains nonsense, no matter how lengthy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verbose nonsense remains nonsense, no matter how lengthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quiviran</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1010007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[quiviran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree. Companies will not be people until we execute one for killing real people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. Companies will not be people until we execute one for killing real people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quiviran</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1010005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[quiviran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1010005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you would be astounded at Rmoneys plan if he is elected President. There is a reason he destroyed all the records from his tenure as Governor and his Olympic work. There are reasons he isn&#039;t releasing his tax returns and there are reasons his money is hidden offshore. Pray we never have to endure the extent of his scheming.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you would be astounded at Rmoneys plan if he is elected President. There is a reason he destroyed all the records from his tenure as Governor and his Olympic work. There are reasons he isn&#8217;t releasing his tax returns and there are reasons his money is hidden offshore. Pray we never have to endure the extent of his scheming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ohandy1</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1009863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ohandy1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The preamble isn&#039;t suggesting socialism, it suggests that the general welfare of the citizens of the US will be better off under the laws of the constitution, which was written to tell government could NOT do.  The responsibility of govt is to provide a stable environment for business where individual rights including property rights, are protected from collectivists.

The speech was what it was.  The president believes in social justice interpreted as taking from the wealthy and giving to the poor.  Look at his speech in context with his campaign&#039;s attacks on the wealthy, in context with his book where he speaks of associating with communists and radicals,  in context of his policies like Obamacare that gives massive regulatory power to unelected bureaucrats, in context with his policy on oil where he ended drilling in our gulf but offers $2billion to Brazil for drilling off shore.  Make your excuses but Obama has a history.  there is a record.  Name one thing he&#039;s done that has been good for business.

Crony capitalism is a byproduct of socialism.  Socialists can only impose their policies by taking other peoples money. That causes a lack of support so they find friends in the business world that they offer to shield from their policies in order to gain their financial support.  Can you say GE?  How about the Unions getting exempted from Obamacare?  How about laws forcing non union members to pay unions even if they don&#039;t want to?  

i don&#039;t care why the article was posted.  it&#039;s not my site and they can post whatever they want.  If you don&#039;t like the comments move on to another article, this one got 10 times the interaction and that means the site is probably gaining audience. they will earn more money from advertisers and the audience has has opportunity  to face a very important issue facing the country.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The preamble isn&#8217;t suggesting socialism, it suggests that the general welfare of the citizens of the US will be better off under the laws of the constitution, which was written to tell government could NOT do.  The responsibility of govt is to provide a stable environment for business where individual rights including property rights, are protected from collectivists.</p>
<p>The speech was what it was.  The president believes in social justice interpreted as taking from the wealthy and giving to the poor.  Look at his speech in context with his campaign&#8217;s attacks on the wealthy, in context with his book where he speaks of associating with communists and radicals,  in context of his policies like Obamacare that gives massive regulatory power to unelected bureaucrats, in context with his policy on oil where he ended drilling in our gulf but offers $2billion to Brazil for drilling off shore.  Make your excuses but Obama has a history.  there is a record.  Name one thing he&#8217;s done that has been good for business.</p>
<p>Crony capitalism is a byproduct of socialism.  Socialists can only impose their policies by taking other peoples money. That causes a lack of support so they find friends in the business world that they offer to shield from their policies in order to gain their financial support.  Can you say GE?  How about the Unions getting exempted from Obamacare?  How about laws forcing non union members to pay unions even if they don&#8217;t want to?  </p>
<p>i don&#8217;t care why the article was posted.  it&#8217;s not my site and they can post whatever they want.  If you don&#8217;t like the comments move on to another article, this one got 10 times the interaction and that means the site is probably gaining audience. they will earn more money from advertisers and the audience has has opportunity  to face a very important issue facing the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ploogman</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1009852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ploogman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[terrible article - Xerox did not create &quot;the internet&quot;

ethernet is not the internet

ethernet was just one of numerous ways to interconnect computers and networks

DARPA was the first use of communications similar to what became the internet and WWW came from berners-lee and europe just like Linus Torvalds came from Europe and put his spin on a PC version of Unix

Unix created the internet
Telephone companies with their lines strung all over the world created the internet
HTTP protocol and DNS created the internet
service providers and telco companies created the internet]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>terrible article &#8211; Xerox did not create &#8220;the internet&#8221;</p>
<p>ethernet is not the internet</p>
<p>ethernet was just one of numerous ways to interconnect computers and networks</p>
<p>DARPA was the first use of communications similar to what became the internet and WWW came from berners-lee and europe just like Linus Torvalds came from Europe and put his spin on a PC version of Unix</p>
<p>Unix created the internet<br />
Telephone companies with their lines strung all over the world created the internet<br />
HTTP protocol and DNS created the internet<br />
service providers and telco companies created the internet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohandy1</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1009842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ohandy1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t consider myself an intellectual but the A in my MBA Econ class says i do know something on this subject.

I say corporations are made of people just like government is.  it&#039;s not a legal point i&#039;m  making, it&#039;s an observation of the obvious.  Power corrupts and that is true in private and public sectors. When execs like those at Enron begin to feel all powerful they think they can flaunt the law, and common decency, and even bend the laws of economics to gain more wealth and power.  You confuse my defense of the free market with defense of bad behavior by those in it.  I don&#039;t advocate a completely unregulated business environment nor does anyone I know.  Just like anti-trust protects us from monopolistic businesses the separation of power protects us from tyranny.  Now ask yourself which has more power to destroy, the corrupt CEO consolidation power  or the corrupt politician?  One ends up in jail (Madoff, Lay) but the other just exempts them self from the law.  Remember the Capital Post Office Scandal?  Government has consolidated too much power through Obamacare and regulatory agencies in the name of protecting people.  Just like the overprotective parent that never lets a child learn about life, the overprotective government oppresses it&#039;s people.

I&#039;m not defending Republicans, they can be just as corrupt. But if Obama is centrist then the democrat party is now the communist party. 

Class warfare is the number one tactic of the Obama campaign.  &quot;fair share&quot;  &quot;fat cats&quot;  &quot;wall street&quot; are all tossed around by the President in a context to evoke anger at the wealthy.  Anyone who wants lower taxes is called &quot;greedy&quot; and &quot;unpatriotic&quot;.   I&#039;m not wealthy and don&#039;t even make enough to worry about federal income taxes.  I do want more opportunity and history says that the opportunity I want for me and my kids is created in a business friendly environment.

The US corporate tax rate is the highest in the world.  
      &quot;Japan lowered its corporate tax rate, leaving the United States with the highest effective rate among developed countries: 39.2 percent.&quot; - USNews.com

You might want to go back to the GAO...

The vast majority of corporations are very small companies. These small companies are barely making it and these rates make it near impossible for them to compete.  Only massive companies that can operate on economies of scale can survive rates like you talk about.  Often by moving significant portions of the company overseas, like GE moved a bunch to China.  The effect of high corporate tax rates is to stifle competition from smaller companies  and ensure the huge companies retain enough market share to insulate them from the affects of predatorial business practices.  

The law of unintended consequences. Unless you are like GE that can pay under 3% because Immelt has political connections... with Democrats.  And they still moved jobs to China.

I don&#039;t think my intellectual height should be at issue here.  It&#039;s your inability to reason and understand the facts that are in front of you.  I don&#039;t care to bait flame, I do hope some will try to think for themselves. Your criticisms are not substantiated except by your own assertions, that means you rely on what you think you know instead of critical thinking and research

Thanks for the criticism..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t consider myself an intellectual but the A in my MBA Econ class says i do know something on this subject.</p>
<p>I say corporations are made of people just like government is.  it&#8217;s not a legal point i&#8217;m  making, it&#8217;s an observation of the obvious.  Power corrupts and that is true in private and public sectors. When execs like those at Enron begin to feel all powerful they think they can flaunt the law, and common decency, and even bend the laws of economics to gain more wealth and power.  You confuse my defense of the free market with defense of bad behavior by those in it.  I don&#8217;t advocate a completely unregulated business environment nor does anyone I know.  Just like anti-trust protects us from monopolistic businesses the separation of power protects us from tyranny.  Now ask yourself which has more power to destroy, the corrupt CEO consolidation power  or the corrupt politician?  One ends up in jail (Madoff, Lay) but the other just exempts them self from the law.  Remember the Capital Post Office Scandal?  Government has consolidated too much power through Obamacare and regulatory agencies in the name of protecting people.  Just like the overprotective parent that never lets a child learn about life, the overprotective government oppresses it&#8217;s people.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not defending Republicans, they can be just as corrupt. But if Obama is centrist then the democrat party is now the communist party. </p>
<p>Class warfare is the number one tactic of the Obama campaign.  &#8220;fair share&#8221;  &#8220;fat cats&#8221;  &#8220;wall street&#8221; are all tossed around by the President in a context to evoke anger at the wealthy.  Anyone who wants lower taxes is called &#8220;greedy&#8221; and &#8220;unpatriotic&#8221;.   I&#8217;m not wealthy and don&#8217;t even make enough to worry about federal income taxes.  I do want more opportunity and history says that the opportunity I want for me and my kids is created in a business friendly environment.</p>
<p>The US corporate tax rate is the highest in the world.<br />
      &#8220;Japan lowered its corporate tax rate, leaving the United States with the highest effective rate among developed countries: 39.2 percent.&#8221; &#8211; USNews.com</p>
<p>You might want to go back to the GAO&#8230;</p>
<p>The vast majority of corporations are very small companies. These small companies are barely making it and these rates make it near impossible for them to compete.  Only massive companies that can operate on economies of scale can survive rates like you talk about.  Often by moving significant portions of the company overseas, like GE moved a bunch to China.  The effect of high corporate tax rates is to stifle competition from smaller companies  and ensure the huge companies retain enough market share to insulate them from the affects of predatorial business practices.  </p>
<p>The law of unintended consequences. Unless you are like GE that can pay under 3% because Immelt has political connections&#8230; with Democrats.  And they still moved jobs to China.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think my intellectual height should be at issue here.  It&#8217;s your inability to reason and understand the facts that are in front of you.  I don&#8217;t care to bait flame, I do hope some will try to think for themselves. Your criticisms are not substantiated except by your own assertions, that means you rely on what you think you know instead of critical thinking and research</p>
<p>Thanks for the criticism..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave H</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-3/#comment-1009833</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vote in Romney and you&#039;ll make it three!!

Where did all the decent politicians go?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote in Romney and you&#8217;ll make it three!!</p>
<p>Where did all the decent politicians go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fidel Castro</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1009796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fidel Castro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here in Cuba we also have roads, bridges, police, a military, factories and lots of people, but we have no prosperity, innovation, rich movie stars or moguls; just poor people.  Our streets are home to old cars and pedestrians.  And dirt.  BUT, our misfortune has nothing to so with the fact that there is no private property here, or that one has no right to the fruits of their hard labor.  Our collectivist government is the best in the world.  The only fair system.  Capitalism is cruel somehow.  Our people are very happy in their poverty and destitution.  Just ask them.  And Michael Moore swears we have the best health care system.   It&#039;s the evil gringo that keeps us in poverty.  All we need is a Stimulus.  Yeah, that&#039;s it.  I&#039;ll call Joe Biden; he&#039;s VERY GENEROUS, gives huge amounts to charity every year.  Real humanitarian, he is.  Takes the train, you know!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Cuba we also have roads, bridges, police, a military, factories and lots of people, but we have no prosperity, innovation, rich movie stars or moguls; just poor people.  Our streets are home to old cars and pedestrians.  And dirt.  BUT, our misfortune has nothing to so with the fact that there is no private property here, or that one has no right to the fruits of their hard labor.  Our collectivist government is the best in the world.  The only fair system.  Capitalism is cruel somehow.  Our people are very happy in their poverty and destitution.  Just ask them.  And Michael Moore swears we have the best health care system.   It&#8217;s the evil gringo that keeps us in poverty.  All we need is a Stimulus.  Yeah, that&#8217;s it.  I&#8217;ll call Joe Biden; he&#8217;s VERY GENEROUS, gives huge amounts to charity every year.  Real humanitarian, he is.  Takes the train, you know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coal Cracker</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-3/#comment-1009777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coal Cracker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[3.5 year bad trip ... O, what a Bummer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3.5 year bad trip &#8230; O, what a Bummer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-3/#comment-1009776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very disappointed that MDN published this rubbish..I didn&#039;t realize this was a right wing blog?  Fortune has a very good article shooting down L. Gordon Crovitz and the Wall Street Journal for so many factual errors its ridiculous!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very disappointed that MDN published this rubbish..I didn&#8217;t realize this was a right wing blog?  Fortune has a very good article shooting down L. Gordon Crovitz and the Wall Street Journal for so many factual errors its ridiculous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1009775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right! Unregulated banking practices have NOTHING to do with Europe&#039;s problems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right! Unregulated banking practices have NOTHING to do with Europe&#8217;s problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CitizenX</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-3/#comment-1009764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CitizenX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is revisionist.  I wasn&#039;t at one of those universities but as a computer salesperson in 1980 I learned that Darpanet morphed into Arpanet and the intent was to create a survivable network.  When it became Arpanet it was to allow schools to communicate to share research.

Apple paid Xerox 4 million dollars to use some of their ideas, not 1 million.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is revisionist.  I wasn&#8217;t at one of those universities but as a computer salesperson in 1980 I learned that Darpanet morphed into Arpanet and the intent was to create a survivable network.  When it became Arpanet it was to allow schools to communicate to share research.</p>
<p>Apple paid Xerox 4 million dollars to use some of their ideas, not 1 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1009761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Tessellator: wrong.  privately held S-corps outnumber publicly traded corps by an order of magnitude.  and if you think your shareholder vote is worth the paper it&#039;s printed on, you&#039;re dreaming.  Publicly-traded corporations are designed for three things:

1) minimize personal accountability and liability of owner AND manager
2) attract investment from disinterested &amp; easily-manipulated shareholders
3) maximize personal wealth of board and professional managers (executives)

All else, including shareholder rights, are subservient to these goals of a publicly traded corporation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Tessellator: wrong.  privately held S-corps outnumber publicly traded corps by an order of magnitude.  and if you think your shareholder vote is worth the paper it&#8217;s printed on, you&#8217;re dreaming.  Publicly-traded corporations are designed for three things:</p>
<p>1) minimize personal accountability and liability of owner AND manager<br />
2) attract investment from disinterested &amp; easily-manipulated shareholders<br />
3) maximize personal wealth of board and professional managers (executives)</p>
<p>All else, including shareholder rights, are subservient to these goals of a publicly traded corporation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1009755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who gets the credit, the guy who pays the bills or the lab rat who comes up with the first prototype, or the mega-corporation that floods the mass market with the product?

By any reasonable definition, it takes teamwork to get anything substantial done.  Arguing semantics is a waste of your time and mine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who gets the credit, the guy who pays the bills or the lab rat who comes up with the first prototype, or the mega-corporation that floods the mass market with the product?</p>
<p>By any reasonable definition, it takes teamwork to get anything substantial done.  Arguing semantics is a waste of your time and mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-3/#comment-1009747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a poorly written article, roundly and factually refuted by several sources.  I&#039;m disappointed Mac Daily News chose to republish it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a poorly written article, roundly and factually refuted by several sources.  I&#8217;m disappointed Mac Daily News chose to republish it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gandolf</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-3/#comment-1009739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gandolf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PC Magazine has a great rebuttal to this conservative pro-private-sector drivel spouted by the WSJ.

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2407539,00.asp]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PC Magazine has a great rebuttal to this conservative pro-private-sector drivel spouted by the WSJ.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2407539,00.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2407539,00.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-3/#comment-1009733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe we can all agree that Bush set the bar very low. Unfortunately Obama cannot clear the bar.  So in consecutive terms we have had the two worst Presidents in close to a hundred years even including Jimmy Carter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe we can all agree that Bush set the bar very low. Unfortunately Obama cannot clear the bar.  So in consecutive terms we have had the two worst Presidents in close to a hundred years even including Jimmy Carter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessellator</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1009732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tessellator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you are missing the point, for the most part PEOPLE own the corporations (that&#039;s what publicly held means) Privately held corporations are extremely rare.
SO, it is a large group of people who own shares (i.e. invest their hard earned money) in a company. These are the people who get to decide what the corp does. The public shareholders (owners) hold the ultimate power in a corporation, not the board nor the CEO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are missing the point, for the most part PEOPLE own the corporations (that&#8217;s what publicly held means) Privately held corporations are extremely rare.<br />
SO, it is a large group of people who own shares (i.e. invest their hard earned money) in a company. These are the people who get to decide what the corp does. The public shareholders (owners) hold the ultimate power in a corporation, not the board nor the CEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1009710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would somebody *please* quote statistics from reputable sources?

MY DAD CAN BEAT UP YOUR DAD!

NO MY DAD CAN BEAT UP YOUR DAD!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would somebody *please* quote statistics from reputable sources?</p>
<p>MY DAD CAN BEAT UP YOUR DAD!</p>
<p>NO MY DAD CAN BEAT UP YOUR DAD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photoflight1</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1009709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Photoflight1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey George!

Where&#039;s George?

Why has this icon of everything right about the Republican party gone underground?

He&#039;s not even invited (says he didn&#039;t want to be a distraction?) to the Republican Presidential Convention.

Is there something you know that a whole lot of Republicans and most, if not all, Democrats already know? That George W Bush was a failure as a president. Unless you were a Corporation that is.

So are you a corporation? I heard that they are people now. I guess they&#039;ve discovered their voice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey George!</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s George?</p>
<p>Why has this icon of everything right about the Republican party gone underground?</p>
<p>He&#8217;s not even invited (says he didn&#8217;t want to be a distraction?) to the Republican Presidential Convention.</p>
<p>Is there something you know that a whole lot of Republicans and most, if not all, Democrats already know? That George W Bush was a failure as a president. Unless you were a Corporation that is.</p>
<p>So are you a corporation? I heard that they are people now. I guess they&#8217;ve discovered their voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbone</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1009657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tbone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Go back to school and take an economics class. Learn how the system works. Your arguments are based on myths regarding how classes operate. Class warfare is a method invoked by a  handful of powerful and ruthless men who would pit class against class so that they may sit back and collect the profits in their coffers. 

So, look this up at the GAO or other CREDIBLE keeper of stats.

Corporate taxes and personal income taxes for what we define as truly wealthy people, are the LOWEST they have ever been. They are not enough to pay for the disproportionate benefit that these breaks give to these people. 

You say corporations are people. That is true in the sense that the Supreme Court argued long ago that the corporation is a person in its dealings with accountability in a court of law. If a lawsuit is presented, a corporation can be treated  as one person in regards to litigation (either plaintiff  or defendant). 

recently, the Supreme Court, which has swung ideologically to the right has extended that to political contributions without the need to fully disclose who the people (your word) are behind those contributions.

You (regardless of your political  leanings) are an intellectual midget. 

As far as Obama goes, he is a Centrist Democrat. Some believe that his failure in policy is capitulating to the interests of many people whie serving the needs of none. A socialist indeed!

He&#039;s as much a socialist as you are an intellectual.

You&#039;re not even good at flame baiting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go back to school and take an economics class. Learn how the system works. Your arguments are based on myths regarding how classes operate. Class warfare is a method invoked by a  handful of powerful and ruthless men who would pit class against class so that they may sit back and collect the profits in their coffers. </p>
<p>So, look this up at the GAO or other CREDIBLE keeper of stats.</p>
<p>Corporate taxes and personal income taxes for what we define as truly wealthy people, are the LOWEST they have ever been. They are not enough to pay for the disproportionate benefit that these breaks give to these people. </p>
<p>You say corporations are people. That is true in the sense that the Supreme Court argued long ago that the corporation is a person in its dealings with accountability in a court of law. If a lawsuit is presented, a corporation can be treated  as one person in regards to litigation (either plaintiff  or defendant). </p>
<p>recently, the Supreme Court, which has swung ideologically to the right has extended that to political contributions without the need to fully disclose who the people (your word) are behind those contributions.</p>
<p>You (regardless of your political  leanings) are an intellectual midget. </p>
<p>As far as Obama goes, he is a Centrist Democrat. Some believe that his failure in policy is capitulating to the interests of many people whie serving the needs of none. A socialist indeed!</p>
<p>He&#8217;s as much a socialist as you are an intellectual.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re not even good at flame baiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadowself</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-3/#comment-1009647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shadowself]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Taylor is indulging in a bit of revisionist history.

It WAS FROM THE OUTSET an interconnect between multiple networks. The first day it was turned on it was between four separate universities. I was at one of those universities!

Additionally, to say that it had nothing to do with the cold ware is again revisionist. We were told at every meeting that the underlying purpose of this new network of networks was an experiment to come up with an implementation that would survive a Soviet attack. We were told this was funded by a DoD agency just for this purpose. So either everyone in the U.S. Government involved with the project at the time was lying to everyone else OR Mr. Taylor is changing his story now.  

You decide: 100+ people were lying to every one involved back then or Mr. Taylor is revising his story now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Taylor is indulging in a bit of revisionist history.</p>
<p>It WAS FROM THE OUTSET an interconnect between multiple networks. The first day it was turned on it was between four separate universities. I was at one of those universities!</p>
<p>Additionally, to say that it had nothing to do with the cold ware is again revisionist. We were told at every meeting that the underlying purpose of this new network of networks was an experiment to come up with an implementation that would survive a Soviet attack. We were told this was funded by a DoD agency just for this purpose. So either everyone in the U.S. Government involved with the project at the time was lying to everyone else OR Mr. Taylor is changing his story now.  </p>
<p>You decide: 100+ people were lying to every one involved back then or Mr. Taylor is revising his story now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hannahjs</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-2/#comment-1009644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hannahjs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even Apple at the time offered A/UX, later abandoned for IBM&#039;s AIX until NeXTSTEP changed the whole deal]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even Apple at the time offered A/UX, later abandoned for IBM&#8217;s AIX until NeXTSTEP changed the whole deal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fscuttle</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1009621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fscuttle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well we are running huge deficits aren&#039;t we? It can&#039;t be done by cuts alone. Thats what happens when you have wars that cost a fortune. Lowering taxes and firing teachers, cops and fireman to pay for it certainly isn&#039;t a solution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well we are running huge deficits aren&#8217;t we? It can&#8217;t be done by cuts alone. Thats what happens when you have wars that cost a fortune. Lowering taxes and firing teachers, cops and fireman to pay for it certainly isn&#8217;t a solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Allen</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-3/#comment-1009615</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Link Allen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama did not say that government created Internet, he said &quot;government research&quot; did.

Gordon Crovitz and the Wall Street Journal are trying to make political hay out of this copy.

L.A.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama did not say that government created Internet, he said &#8220;government research&#8221; did.</p>
<p>Gordon Crovitz and the Wall Street Journal are trying to make political hay out of this copy.</p>
<p>L.A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thethirdshoe</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1009599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thethirdshoe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Rick,
Most corporations only care about themselves. 

Why don&#039;t you go ASK those corporations to clean up the air and water pollution.  Oh, and increase the gas mileage in all the vehicles while you are at it.

Learn to put people before the god of money. ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Rick,<br />
Most corporations only care about themselves. </p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you go ASK those corporations to clean up the air and water pollution.  Oh, and increase the gas mileage in all the vehicles while you are at it.</p>
<p>Learn to put people before the god of money. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Empty Taank</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1009598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Empty Taank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;re all in this together - just like in Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, the former Soviet Union and Eastern European Block; they&#039;re all, and were, in it &quot;together&quot; in hunger and despair, and no rights to speak of. You listen to Chavez and Ortega speeches - they&#039;re the same as Obama. Big governments that take away from the rich and give to the poor. It works great every single time, doesn&#039;t it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re all in this together &#8211; just like in Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, the former Soviet Union and Eastern European Block; they&#8217;re all, and were, in it &#8220;together&#8221; in hunger and despair, and no rights to speak of. You listen to Chavez and Ortega speeches &#8211; they&#8217;re the same as Obama. Big governments that take away from the rich and give to the poor. It works great every single time, doesn&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ohandy1</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/no-mr-president-the-government-did-not-create-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1009586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ohandy1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86259#comment-1009586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Business does need the stability of a good government.  There are no business advocates here or anywhere that advocate anarchy.  You confuse the rejection of Obama&#039;s claim with anarchists.  

The anarchists all marched with OWS types.  Businesses are aligned with tea party types, for good reason.

The partnership you are describing is crony capitalism where the playing field isn&#039;t level, whoever is most  in favor with political power gets an advantage.  That was how the Crown worked with the East India Trading Company.  That kind of partnership is always bad for the people.

The constitutional role of government is to create an environment where businesses can engage in economic progress.  Capitalism 101: move assets to a higher value purpose.  Government research is done by people.  People operate under the Rational Actor Paradigm.  Government researchers often become the execs in new companies built on their research, they become rich and powerful.  

Read the whole speech.  The premise is that everything is communal property and government has the right to take what you have and give it to others.  That&#039;s the socialist definition of community.  Now look at the reality of that.  Government takes wealth and gives it to whom?  Solyndra, Unions (GM, SEIU), friends of the party.  That&#039;s who.  The Rational Actor Paradigm doesn&#039;t only apply to business execs.  it works just as well for power hungry politicians.  Put the two in the same room and you get Hugo Chavez.  Eventually one turns on the other and you get Cuba.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Business does need the stability of a good government.  There are no business advocates here or anywhere that advocate anarchy.  You confuse the rejection of Obama&#8217;s claim with anarchists.  </p>
<p>The anarchists all marched with OWS types.  Businesses are aligned with tea party types, for good reason.</p>
<p>The partnership you are describing is crony capitalism where the playing field isn&#8217;t level, whoever is most  in favor with political power gets an advantage.  That was how the Crown worked with the East India Trading Company.  That kind of partnership is always bad for the people.</p>
<p>The constitutional role of government is to create an environment where businesses can engage in economic progress.  Capitalism 101: move assets to a higher value purpose.  Government research is done by people.  People operate under the Rational Actor Paradigm.  Government researchers often become the execs in new companies built on their research, they become rich and powerful.  </p>
<p>Read the whole speech.  The premise is that everything is communal property and government has the right to take what you have and give it to others.  That&#8217;s the socialist definition of community.  Now look at the reality of that.  Government takes wealth and gives it to whom?  Solyndra, Unions (GM, SEIU), friends of the party.  That&#8217;s who.  The Rational Actor Paradigm doesn&#8217;t only apply to business execs.  it works just as well for power hungry politicians.  Put the two in the same room and you get Hugo Chavez.  Eventually one turns on the other and you get Cuba.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
