<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple vs. Samsung patent trial kicks off in Australia; likely to run until well into 2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/apple-vs-samsung-patent-trial-kicks-off-in-australia-likely-to-run-until-well-into-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/apple-vs-samsung-patent-trial-kicks-off-in-australia-likely-to-run-until-well-into-2014/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:46:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunbeamrapier</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/apple-vs-samsung-patent-trial-kicks-off-in-australia-likely-to-run-until-well-into-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1009067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sunbeamrapier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86180#comment-1009067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MDN&#039;s take on this reflects a typical American jingoism.  Courts around the world will usually consider decisions by courts in other jurisidictions, even if they don&#039;t automatically accept them as precedents.  Despite differences in laws, much of the evidence and legal argument will apply, especially in patent law.  By reviewing the decisions made by their counterparts in related actions, courts can save time and avoid missing points of law which might otherwise be raised in an appeal.  Patent law is largely similar everywhere, because patents are internationally applicable.  A court is quite capable of ignoring those aspects of a patent suit which reflect minors differences in local law.  Apple generates more than 50% of its business from non-US sales, so the international defence of its patents is vital.  It would not be in Apple&#039;s interests if courts around the world were encouraged to ignore decisions elsewhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MDN&#8217;s take on this reflects a typical American jingoism.  Courts around the world will usually consider decisions by courts in other jurisidictions, even if they don&#8217;t automatically accept them as precedents.  Despite differences in laws, much of the evidence and legal argument will apply, especially in patent law.  By reviewing the decisions made by their counterparts in related actions, courts can save time and avoid missing points of law which might otherwise be raised in an appeal.  Patent law is largely similar everywhere, because patents are internationally applicable.  A court is quite capable of ignoring those aspects of a patent suit which reflect minors differences in local law.  Apple generates more than 50% of its business from non-US sales, so the international defence of its patents is vital.  It would not be in Apple&#8217;s interests if courts around the world were encouraged to ignore decisions elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HD Boy</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/apple-vs-samsung-patent-trial-kicks-off-in-australia-likely-to-run-until-well-into-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1008999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HD Boy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86180#comment-1008999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boycott all Samsung consumer electronics products.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boycott all Samsung consumer electronics products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eldernorm</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/apple-vs-samsung-patent-trial-kicks-off-in-australia-likely-to-run-until-well-into-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1008844</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eldernorm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86180#comment-1008844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem is that Samsung is the largest and cheapest provider of many Apple parts.  They are also different divisions and report thru different channels. 

Also, Apple is slowing getting more producers certified on products so that they can move away from Samsung as time moves forward.  

Just saying.... 
en]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that Samsung is the largest and cheapest provider of many Apple parts.  They are also different divisions and report thru different channels. </p>
<p>Also, Apple is slowing getting more producers certified on products so that they can move away from Samsung as time moves forward.  </p>
<p>Just saying&#8230;.<br />
en</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: botvinnik</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/07/23/apple-vs-samsung-patent-trial-kicks-off-in-australia-likely-to-run-until-well-into-2014/comment-page-1/#comment-1008825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[botvinnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=86180#comment-1008825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I concur, it&#039;s like paying for your ex-wife&#039;s divorce lawyer and then taking him out to dinner.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur, it&#8217;s like paying for your ex-wife&#8217;s divorce lawyer and then taking him out to dinner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
