<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ETSI publishes new 4FF nano SIM standard: Apple&#8217;s unaltered design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/etsi-publishes-new-4ff-nano-sim-standard-apples-unaltered-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/etsi-publishes-new-4ff-nano-sim-standard-apples-unaltered-design/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 05:54:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/etsi-publishes-new-4ff-nano-sim-standard-apples-unaltered-design/comment-page-1/#comment-989814</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 07:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=83305#comment-989814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uh, no. MDN was not being sarcastic. Just wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, no. MDN was not being sarcastic. Just wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dinjin201</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/etsi-publishes-new-4ff-nano-sim-standard-apples-unaltered-design/comment-page-1/#comment-989784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dinjin201]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=83305#comment-989784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah. You&#039;re right. I totally didn&#039;t think about that. :P I stand corrected. Well said, sir.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah. You&#8217;re right. I totally didn&#8217;t think about that. <img src='http://s2.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  I stand corrected. Well said, sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: praus</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/etsi-publishes-new-4ff-nano-sim-standard-apples-unaltered-design/comment-page-1/#comment-989733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[praus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 20:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=83305#comment-989733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree but I&#039;ve yet to see any clear evidence that Apple&#039;s design isn&#039;t the best. I&#039;ve heard a bunch of pissing a moaning and thats about ti. Seems this problem some had with Apple&#039;s design was a notch to optionally lock the SIM in place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree but I&#8217;ve yet to see any clear evidence that Apple&#8217;s design isn&#8217;t the best. I&#8217;ve heard a bunch of pissing a moaning and thats about ti. Seems this problem some had with Apple&#8217;s design was a notch to optionally lock the SIM in place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenrm</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/etsi-publishes-new-4ff-nano-sim-standard-apples-unaltered-design/comment-page-1/#comment-989723</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kenrm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=83305#comment-989723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever heard of the word &quot;Sarcasm&quot;.
 If you have been frequenting MDN for any amount of time you would understand the irony and truth in the above quoted word.

Enjoy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever heard of the word &#8220;Sarcasm&#8221;.<br />
 If you have been frequenting MDN for any amount of time you would understand the irony and truth in the above quoted word.</p>
<p>Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: disposableidentity</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/etsi-publishes-new-4ff-nano-sim-standard-apples-unaltered-design/comment-page-1/#comment-989713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[disposableidentity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 18:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=83305#comment-989713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, but often enough &quot;Apple&#039;s idea&quot; is a good shorthand for &quot;the best idea&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, but often enough &#8220;Apple&#8217;s idea&#8221; is a good shorthand for &#8220;the best idea&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spark</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/etsi-publishes-new-4ff-nano-sim-standard-apples-unaltered-design/comment-page-1/#comment-989696</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 16:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=83305#comment-989696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. -- Don&#039;t know what&#039;s up with MDN apparently suggesting that Apple should set Standards just because it is Apple. I sure don&#039;t believe that, and I doubt many at Apple do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. &#8212; Don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s up with MDN apparently suggesting that Apple should set Standards just because it is Apple. I sure don&#8217;t believe that, and I doubt many at Apple do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mossman</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/etsi-publishes-new-4ff-nano-sim-standard-apples-unaltered-design/comment-page-1/#comment-989663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mossman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 15:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=83305#comment-989663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Damn straight! How short some people&#039;s memories are (or maybe they weren&#039;t around), only 10 years ago Internet Exploder had 95%+ browser share, Windows had 90%+ market share, and RIM/WinCE/Nokia/Palm ruled the mobile market.

If they&#039;d been allowed to dictate things like they &quot;should&quot; have, we&#039;d be at least 5 years behind in every technology they ruled in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn straight! How short some people&#8217;s memories are (or maybe they weren&#8217;t around), only 10 years ago Internet Exploder had 95%+ browser share, Windows had 90%+ market share, and RIM/WinCE/Nokia/Palm ruled the mobile market.</p>
<p>If they&#8217;d been allowed to dictate things like they &#8220;should&#8221; have, we&#8217;d be at least 5 years behind in every technology they ruled in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 24january1984</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/etsi-publishes-new-4ff-nano-sim-standard-apples-unaltered-design/comment-page-1/#comment-989610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[24january1984]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=83305#comment-989610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Precisely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Precisely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrishoward</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/etsi-publishes-new-4ff-nano-sim-standard-apples-unaltered-design/comment-page-1/#comment-989585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chrishoward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 09:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=83305#comment-989585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t agree with MDN&#039;s take. It implies Apple rode roughshod over the process. I&#039;m sure Apple&#039;s design won because it was the best. Again. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t agree with MDN&#8217;s take. It implies Apple rode roughshod over the process. I&#8217;m sure Apple&#8217;s design won because it was the best. Again. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shinolashow</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/etsi-publishes-new-4ff-nano-sim-standard-apples-unaltered-design/comment-page-1/#comment-989581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shinolashow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 08:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=83305#comment-989581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NO.

Like Steve Jobs said- the best ideas should win. If another company had a better idea than apple then it should have won.

The constant danger is the lesser idea wining due to economic interests. phew for once.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO.</p>
<p>Like Steve Jobs said- the best ideas should win. If another company had a better idea than apple then it should have won.</p>
<p>The constant danger is the lesser idea wining due to economic interests. phew for once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/etsi-publishes-new-4ff-nano-sim-standard-apples-unaltered-design/comment-page-1/#comment-989580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 08:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=83305#comment-989580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes they does!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes they does!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alanaudio</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/etsi-publishes-new-4ff-nano-sim-standard-apples-unaltered-design/comment-page-1/#comment-989575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alanaudio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 07:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=83305#comment-989575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That small locking notch would have put and end to all the misery caused by SIM cards accidentally falling out.


Err .... well it might do if SIM&#039;s did routinely fall out accidentally.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That small locking notch would have put and end to all the misery caused by SIM cards accidentally falling out.</p>
<p>Err &#8230;. well it might do if SIM&#8217;s did routinely fall out accidentally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dinjin201</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/etsi-publishes-new-4ff-nano-sim-standard-apples-unaltered-design/comment-page-1/#comment-989567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dinjin201]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 05:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=83305#comment-989567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good. Because the market LEADER should dictate things.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good. Because the market LEADER should dictate things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: praus</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/etsi-publishes-new-4ff-nano-sim-standard-apples-unaltered-design/comment-page-1/#comment-989546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[praus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 03:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=83305#comment-989546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So…the whole thing these other companies were worried about was a small notch on the side that they could optionally be use to lock the SIM in place?!? That seems like a silly thing to care about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So…the whole thing these other companies were worried about was a small notch on the side that they could optionally be use to lock the SIM in place?!? That seems like a silly thing to care about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
