Comments on: Apple to introduce TV SDK at WWDC, says source http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/apple-to-introduce-tv-sdk-at-wwdc-says-source/ Apple and Mac News Mon, 20 May 2013 11:40:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Cubert http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/apple-to-introduce-tv-sdk-at-wwdc-says-source/comment-page-1/#comment-989501 Fri, 08 Jun 2012 21:33:55 +0000 http://macdailynews.com/?p=83264#comment-989501 LOL. But I am thinking that this will be one of the 2 hour ones. Despite the plethora of awesomeness, people will still bitch and moan that their own personal pet peeve wasn’t addressed.

]]> By: Spark http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/apple-to-introduce-tv-sdk-at-wwdc-says-source/comment-page-1/#comment-989489 Fri, 08 Jun 2012 21:06:29 +0000 http://macdailynews.com/?p=83264#comment-989489 I’d REALLY like to see Tim pull a “One More Thing” moment. Just for old times.

]]> By: Spark http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/apple-to-introduce-tv-sdk-at-wwdc-says-source/comment-page-1/#comment-989488 Fri, 08 Jun 2012 21:05:26 +0000 http://macdailynews.com/?p=83264#comment-989488 Herman

]]> By: x http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/apple-to-introduce-tv-sdk-at-wwdc-says-source/comment-page-1/#comment-989456 Fri, 08 Jun 2012 19:34:20 +0000 http://macdailynews.com/?p=83264#comment-989456 Hope they bring back the 3.5 inch floppy. A retro kinda thing. Attach it to your iPad and experience sheer rapture.

]]> By: Laughing_Boy48 http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/apple-to-introduce-tv-sdk-at-wwdc-says-source/comment-page-1/#comment-989447 Fri, 08 Jun 2012 19:18:20 +0000 http://macdailynews.com/?p=83264#comment-989447 Let’s get some Hulu Plus and a useful USB port.

]]> By: althegeo http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/apple-to-introduce-tv-sdk-at-wwdc-says-source/comment-page-1/#comment-989442 Fri, 08 Jun 2012 19:15:29 +0000 http://macdailynews.com/?p=83264#comment-989442 I use iTunes a lot. I don’t see anything wrong with it.

Enlighten me jim.

]]> By: abcd http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/apple-to-introduce-tv-sdk-at-wwdc-says-source/comment-page-1/#comment-989441 Fri, 08 Jun 2012 19:14:13 +0000 http://macdailynews.com/?p=83264#comment-989441 Just 90 minutes.
Intermission.
And another 90 minutes.

]]> By: Cubert http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/apple-to-introduce-tv-sdk-at-wwdc-says-source/comment-page-1/#comment-989427 Fri, 08 Jun 2012 19:00:54 +0000 http://macdailynews.com/?p=83264#comment-989427 And this mother of all keynote addresses will be how long?

]]> By: iwatchamacallit http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/apple-to-introduce-tv-sdk-at-wwdc-says-source/comment-page-1/#comment-989420 Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:49:29 +0000 http://macdailynews.com/?p=83264#comment-989420 Now if each App that was deployed to an Apple TV had to publish a content API so that the OS could take a peak at every app and decide which one is the owner of say Lost or Breaking Bad and then allow the user to simply search/Siri for said program and have the appropriate content app (gatekeeper) return the content with accompanying advertising (content I never pay attention to) that would be neat!

]]> By: tbone http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/apple-to-introduce-tv-sdk-at-wwdc-says-source/comment-page-1/#comment-989412 Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:29:07 +0000 http://macdailynews.com/?p=83264#comment-989412 Old crustiness is delicious with the right wine.

]]> By: jim http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/apple-to-introduce-tv-sdk-at-wwdc-says-source/comment-page-1/#comment-989410 Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:26:09 +0000 http://macdailynews.com/?p=83264#comment-989410 An app *like* iTunes would make sense, but iTunes is in desperate need of a complete rethink and overhaul that they’d best not shoe-horn in yet-another entire class of functionality. iTunes is THE app that let Microsoft to the conclusion that it’s okay to bolt entirely new interfaces on top of old crustiness.

]]> By: silverhawk1 http://macdailynews.com/2012/06/08/apple-to-introduce-tv-sdk-at-wwdc-says-source/comment-page-1/#comment-989409 Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:25:47 +0000 http://macdailynews.com/?p=83264#comment-989409 I wonder if the source was Gene Munster?

]]>