At its 55th meeting held on 31 May and 1 June 2012 in Osaka, Japan, the European Telecommunications Standards Institute’s (ETSI) Smart Card Platform Technical Committee agreed a new form factor for the UICC, popularly known as the SIM card.
Today’s SIM card designs take up a significant amount of space inside a mobile device. This space is more and more valuable in today’s handsets which deliver an ever increasing number of features.
The fourth form factor (4FF) card will be 40% smaller than the current smallest SIM card design, at 12.3mm wide by 8.8mm high, and 0.67mm thick. It can be packaged and distributed in a way that is backwards compatible with existing SIM card designs. The new design will offer the same functionality as all current SIM cards.
According to ETSI, the SIM is the most successful smart card application ever. A SIM card is used to securely associate a mobile device with a customer account, preventing fraud and ensuring that calls are correctly routed to customers. It is an essential security feature of mobile networks, and is integrated into every GSM, UMTS and LTE device. Over 25 billion SIM card and derivatives have been produced so far, and the industry continues to issue over 4.5 billion SIM cards each year.
The new form factor was adopted by industry with the involvement of major mobile network operators, smart card suppliers and mobile device manufacturers. The new design will be published in due course in ETSI’s TS 102 221 specification, freely available like all ETSI standards from the ETSI website.
MacDailyNews Take: Note to the iPhone wannabes and roadkill of the world: What Apple wants, Apple gets. And don’t you forget it.
Source: ETSI
Related articles:
Samsung files formal complaint with ETSI over nano-SIM vote; vote continues anyway – May 23, 2012
RIM, Motorola told Apple they could find a nano-SIM compromise: Here it is – May 18, 2012
Apple modified nano-SIM design to fix concerns, standard to be decided this month – May 9, 2012
ETSI postponed vote on nano-SIM card standard after Apple rivals complain – March 30, 2012
Beleaguered RIM joins Nokia in whining about Apple’s nano-SIM tactics – March 29, 2012
Nokia won’t license ‘essential’ patents if Apple’s nano-SIM standard is selected – March 28, 2012
Apple wins patent relating to Nano SIM and iWallet chip – March 27, 2012
Beleaguered Nokia claims Apple royalty-free nano-SIM promise is hollow – March 26, 2012
Apple offers royalty-free license to nano-SIM patents, a proposed standard backed by most European carriers – March 26, 2012
Apple uses clout in attempt to push smartphones to use ‘nano-SIM’ cards – March 21, 2012
Have class mdn, no need for that.
Well I think it’s a little late for that 🙂
Yeah, the sense of Schadenfreude that permeates MDN is sometimes way over the top.
…and thats just how we like it.
Only bottom feeders like that kind of commentary.
Feel better now, Gregg? High and mighty and superior to the rest of us?
“It is the certainty that they possess the truth that makes men cruel.” -Anatole France, novelist, essayist, Nobel laureate (1844-1924)
Gregg,
You are spot on. People need to start using a little more common sense in their communications with each other.
What you do to the Other, you do to yourself… You are He!
or people with a sense of humor…apparently you have none.
The MDN takes have gone from playfully snippy to dickish.
The DCW in reference to RIMM and the SIDAGTMBTTS in reference to Dell are accepted with a smile. These are both companies that were dismissive of Apple when Apple was an underdog. Everyone likes to see the little guy achieve great things and put the big boys in their place.
The problem is that Apple is now the big guy, and them getting their way because they are big is exactly the thing that you were against when other companies did it 10 years ago.
MDN, You don’t need to apologize for Apple’s dominance, but you don’t need to be asses either. Apple will (hopefully one day long in the future) be on the decline. When that happens, it will be nice to not have spit on every single person that wasn’t on the Apple bandwagon.
What’s the difference between John Dvorak, Ron Enderle, and CNBC talking heads? Nothing, they’re all hit whores.
Sorry, the above should have read:
What’s the difference between John Dvorak, Ron Enderle, CNBC talking heads, and MDN editors? Nothing, they’re all hit whores.
“Be nice, be tepid, be sweet, be bland, be dispassionate, be equitable, be even-handed, be undogmatic, be kind, be forgiving, be laid-back, be BORING . . . be . . . be . . . more like Caspar Milquetoast, MDN!”
Right, Gregg? Right, Charlie? Right, Rex? Don’t ruffle ANYONE’s feathers in any respect, right, guys? There’s never a reason for payback of any kind or measure when one has been the crap-fest target of the tech industry for over 30 years, right?
Well, sucks to be you folks when you visit this site, for passion, commitment, loyalty–and uncompromised love–for a company, its leaders, and its products remain intact and inviolable. Why not go somewhere else for your news if the editorial policies of this site offend you so? (Answer: Trolls, one and all, they like the smell of their own ordure.)
Well, call it what you will, but I’ve owned Macs since the very first one and I stuck with this company through it all, and have read and enjoyed MDN for a good part of that time… and this particular take just seemed unusually – and unnecessarily – arrogant. Frankly Mr. Cromwell, your response seems overly sensitive. Back under your bridge sir, back under your bridge.