<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2012 Fortune 500 list released: Apple Inc. #17</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2012/05/07/2012-fortune-500-list-released-apple-inc-17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/05/07/2012-fortune-500-list-released-apple-inc-17/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 04:58:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: b9bot</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/05/07/2012-fortune-500-list-released-apple-inc-17/comment-page-1/#comment-977373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[b9bot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 17:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=80744#comment-977373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is another reason Apple stock should be at $800 a share by now, not dropping in the $500 a share like it today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is another reason Apple stock should be at $800 a share by now, not dropping in the $500 a share like it today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: medic48</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/05/07/2012-fortune-500-list-released-apple-inc-17/comment-page-1/#comment-977328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[medic48]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 16:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=80744#comment-977328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s calculated on revenue, not profit. If calculated on profit, Apple would be ranked #3. If calculated on stock valuation, rated #1.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s calculated on revenue, not profit. If calculated on profit, Apple would be ranked #3. If calculated on stock valuation, rated #1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R2</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/05/07/2012-fortune-500-list-released-apple-inc-17/comment-page-1/#comment-977326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 16:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=80744#comment-977326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m confused by #5.  Didn&#039;t they change their name to Government Motors?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused by #5.  Didn&#8217;t they change their name to Government Motors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexkhan2000</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/05/07/2012-fortune-500-list-released-apple-inc-17/comment-page-1/#comment-977323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alexkhan2000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 16:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=80744#comment-977323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Fortune 500 ranking is strictly by revenue. Apple will reach #5 in revenue at the end of the current fiscal year (around $165 billion) and should overtake Exxon as #1 in profits (over $45 billion). Apple has been #1 in market cap for some time now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Fortune 500 ranking is strictly by revenue. Apple will reach #5 in revenue at the end of the current fiscal year (around $165 billion) and should overtake Exxon as #1 in profits (over $45 billion). Apple has been #1 in market cap for some time now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jarrettdailynews</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/05/07/2012-fortune-500-list-released-apple-inc-17/comment-page-1/#comment-977321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jarrettdailynews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 16:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=80744#comment-977321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple&#039;s 2012 revenues already stand at almost $86 Billion and their profits are nearly equal to all of last year. At the end of this year Apple will be #10 in regard to revenue and easily #1 in profit when 2012 closes. Amazing growth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s 2012 revenues already stand at almost $86 Billion and their profits are nearly equal to all of last year. At the end of this year Apple will be #10 in regard to revenue and easily #1 in profit when 2012 closes. Amazing growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FutureMedia</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2012/05/07/2012-fortune-500-list-released-apple-inc-17/comment-page-1/#comment-977319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FutureMedia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 16:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macdailynews.com/?p=80744#comment-977319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s now #1 @ more than $500 Billion while Exxon is less than $400 Billion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s now #1 @ more than $500 Billion while Exxon is less than $400 Billion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
