“The commission said that it was also looking into whether Google may have given its own services ‘preferential placement’ in search results. In addition to its search engine, Google has a growing number of other online businesses, including mapping, translation, video and electronic commerce services, many of which, like the search engine, are supported by advertising,” Kanter and Pfanner report. “Google already faces separate antitrust inquiries in Italy, Germany and France. It has also faced criticism on other matters, including privacy and copyright protection, in a number of European countries.”
Kanter and Pfanner report, “Google’s powerful position on the Internet has been a particular sore point in Europe, where the company controls more than 80 percent of the online search market, compared with about 66 percent in the United States, according to ComScore, a research firm.”
Full article here.
The European Commission’s press release:
The European Commission has decided to open an antitrust investigation into allegations that Google Inc. has abused a dominant position in online search, in violation of European Union rules (Article 102 TFEU). The opening of formal proceedings follows complaints by search service providers about unfavourable treatment of their services in Google’s unpaid and sponsored search results coupled with an alleged preferential placement of Google’s own services. This initiation of proceedings does not imply that the Commission has proof of any infringements. It only signifies that the Commission will conduct an in-depth investigation of the case as a matter of priority.
Google’s internet search engine provides for two types of results when people are searching for information. These are unpaid search results, which are sometimes also referred to as “natural”, “organic” or “algorithmic” search results, and third party advertisements shown at the top and at the right hand side of Google’s search results page (so-called paid search results or sponsored links).
The Commission will investigate whether Google has abused a dominant market position in online search by allegedly lowering the ranking of unpaid search results of competing services which are specialised in providing users with specific online content such as price comparisons (so-called vertical search services) and by according preferential placement to the results of its own vertical search services in order to shut out competing services. The Commission will also look into allegations that Google lowered the ‘Quality Score’ for sponsored links of competing vertical search services. The Quality Score is one of the factors that determine the price paid to Google by advertisers.*
The Commission’s probe will additionally focus on allegations that Google imposes exclusivity obligations on advertising partners, preventing them from placing certain types of competing ads on their web sites, as well as on computer and software vendors, with the aim of shutting out competing search tools. Finally, it will investigate suspected restrictions on the portability of online advertising campaign data to competing online advertising platforms.**
What is the legal base for the decision? The legal base of this procedural step is Article 11(6) of Council Regulation No 1/2003 and article 2(1) of Commission Regulation No 773/2004.
Article 11(6) of Regulation No 1/2003 provides that the initiation of proceedings relieves the competition authorities of the Member States of their authority to apply the competition rules laid down in Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty.
Article 2 of Regulation No 773/2004 provides that the Commission can initiate proceedings with a view to adopting at a later stage a decision on substance according to Articles 7-10 of Regulation No 1/2003.
The Commission has informed the company about this decision. The Competition Authorities of the Member States have also been informed.
There is no legal deadline to complete inquiries into anticompetitive conduct. Their duration depends on a number of factors, including the complexity of each case and the extent to which the undertakings concerned co-operate with the Commission.
*The Quality Score influences the likelihood of an ad to be displayed by Google and its ranking. If two advertisers are using the same key words, the site which has a lower Quality Score will have to offer a higher price to rank at the same place.
**An online advertising platform is a virtual marketplace that brings together advertisers and publishers offering advertising space on the internet.
Source: European Commission
Now, can that asshat mole
Reading this, my eyebrows didn’t exactly shoot off my forehead. Expect the U.S. to follow suit.
Sounds like the creepy line may have been crossed.
Don’t be evil, unless it’s profitable.
I read an article last week about this that showed evidence of Google’s products/services getting better organic indexing than more established and popular competitors. I wish I could remember where I saw this to link, but it convinced me that Google was taking advantage of its control of the search process to “juice” their own rankings and “hobble” others. If this is true, Google has seriously abused its position.
Google has abused much of the faith and trust that many users and companies that dealt with it in good faith, had put in their relationships with it.
They cannot be trusted and have proved it time and again. The problem with Google is twofold:
1. They under estimate everyone’s smarts
2. They over estimate and are too cocky about themselves
Selling Advertising or selling your “products”.
Selling both has inherent “being evil” conflicts that will result in a Ma Bell type breakup is my guess.
@breeze
Agreed! I guess this is an “Anti-Trust” issue in more ways than one…
” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”grin” style=”border:0;” />
So what happens if Google just tells the EU to pound sand? How does the EU remove Google from the internet? The Eu fines Google and Google doesn’t pay.