iPhone OS 3.1 contains code for mystery Apple product; ‘MacBook touch’ on the way?

“An updated USBConfiguration.plist in the most recent version of iPhone OS 3.1 beta offers compelling evidence that Apple has continued development on an unknown device, referred to as ‘iProd,’ that was first discovered in March,” Jeff Smykil reports for Ars Technica.

“As most Apple devices are assigned the ‘1,1’ designation in the first revision, this leads us to believe that there is indeed an unknown product inside of Apple under active development running the iPhone OS,” Smykil reports.

“While it’s easy to speculate that this may be the rumored Apple tablet we keep hearing so much about lately, we have yet to find any evidence that iPhone OS 3.1 is capable of running on a device with a tablet-sized screen. It’s just as possible it may refer to the camera-equipped iPod nano, though we doubt such a device would run iPhone OS. Hell, it might even be an iPhone nano,” Smykil writes. “What we are willing to bet on is that with a 1,1 moniker the product will see public release soon—perhaps as early as September, when Apple typically unveils new iPods.”

Read more in the full article here.

27 Comments

  1. While we can speculate all we want — my take is that Apple will not come out with something unless it is a game changer, i.e., after a bunch of MP3 players were out there, it came out with the iPod, when a bunch of smart phones it came out with the iPhone……now with Kindle & eReader & lousy net books, Apple will come out with the new iBook. The NBT is a device that contains hundreds of books, plus music, movies & the net, virtual keyboard …. and eventually (maybe now?) a phone. Think of what Apple did with (some say to, but I say they did themselves in) the music industry, it can do the same to/for the book industry. It is ripe for a game changer. The key is readability, storage and, of course, content in the form of books, newspapers, magazines, journals….We have the iTunes Store, we have the App Store, now the Book Store. What could be simpler. And while the publishers gear up, the iBook’s other functions will get people in the door. I cannot wait.

  2. One of the things I’ve never totally understood nor had explained to me was this.

    When the iPhone was first announced, I specifically remember them (maybe even Steve Jobs) said that the iPhone contained OS X and not a striped down version.

    So.. My questions are..

    (a) if the iPhone is really OS X…then why can’t I run iPhone aps on my Mac computer or have them ported over?

    (b) will the iTablet be OS X as an operating system or iPhone 3.x as an operating system??

    I guess the

  3. I think with Software 3.1 the iPhone will be able to accept connections using a kind of iPod Connector-to-USB adapter in order to connect Printers, scanners, hard drives or whatever to the iPhone. It would be great to scan images or print photos direct with the iPhone/ iPod Touch without needing a computer! Or just transfer media to a pen drive.

  4. Of course, there are some other possibilities that it could be:

    iPod Touch revision.

    iPod typo.

    Or my personal favorite, the all-new Chinese iPod, or as the Chinese refer to it, iProd!

  5. i am also convinced it will be called iBook.

    everyone already knows the name, it is a good reference to the killer app (ebooks, magazines, newspapers) and also has the portable computer connotation.

    the iphone os is perfect for that form factor. it is a new paradigm of mobile computing. of course you can’t edit excel sheets or do heavy layouts in indesign. but that’s not what it’s for. it is an app and media machine with all the content you can imagine just one click away.

    this thingy will change everything. again.

  6. iProd, therefore I am.

    Finally, a device perfect for making multimedia entertainment as well as viewing it. And you know what kind of entertainment I’m talking about. The commercial growth will ne huge.

  7. It’s true that the iPhone/iPod touch and the Macs both use OS X, but they both use their own flavors of OS X, OS X iPhone and Mac OS X, respectively. If you notice, they are very careful as to say that it runs a full version of OS X, but not Mac OS X. Each of the OS X’s are tailored to run the specific needs of the machine it is operating one. The core basics are the same though.

    From Wikipedia:

    The iPhone OS or OS X iPhone is the operating system developed by Apple Inc. for the iPhone and iPod touch.[2][3] Like Mac OS X, from which it was derived, it uses the Darwin foundation.[4] iPhone OS has four abstraction layers: the Core OS layer, the Core Services layer, the Media layer, and the Cocoa Touch layer. The operating system takes less than 240 Megabytes of the device’s total memory storage.[5]

  8. still maybe need to tidy up the OS naming! iPhone/iPod running iPhone OS is a bit award and adding another device; more so. OS X isn’t given enough credit even if it is officially OS X iPhone, I think?

    OS X Mobile would make sense. Also help Mac sales with the clearer association of OS X.

    Still to be seen if this new device is pure speculation or not and if not then if it’s a Mac or an “iPhone”!?!

  9. Now that M$FT is trying PILLAGE and clone all apps in the Apple app store (see the previous story about M$FT encouraging developers to port iPhone apps to Microsoft Phone), rather than make their own app store, I can see how a new advancement in the iPod touch and iPhone lineage is needed…

    Follow me… what will keep Apple iPhone and touch developers interested in Apple as their number 1 platform? More, and advanced, hardware products which consumers will buy to run those apps!

    A bigger screen — great for games, reading, text, web, ebooks, copy and paste from books and text to yourself, everything becomes available at your fingertips — literally. Bigger screen, a fantastic gaming experience. Great for movies and video. This has to be the next step.

    If I were a touch / iphone games developer, I’d be praying for this to happen.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.