In an article (“Why Is Steve Jobs Skipping MacWorld?”) by Josh Quittner posted late yesterday, TIME Magazine has manipulated an accompanying photo of Apple CEO Steve Jobs to make him appear thinner.
Jobs’ suffered a rare form of survivable pancreatic cancer (islet cell) and had successful surgery. According to reports, in July 2004, Jobs underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy (or “Whipple procedure”) that successfully removed the tumor. Also according to reports, Jobs did not require nor did he receive chemotherapy or radiation therapy. As of 2008, there was reportedly no evidence of identifiable cancer four years after surgery.
In early August 2006, Jobs delivered the keynote for Apple’s annual Worldwide Developers Conference and his thinness became a cause of concern for some – mainly those who did not see him in person that day and judged only from still photos or, perhaps, who stood to benefit from manipulating AAPL’s share price lower.
Two years later, similar concerns followed Jobs’ 2008 WWDC keynote address. An Apple spokesperson stated that Jobs had a “common bug” and that he was taking antibiotics. Some people need to look up “Whipple procedure” and/or discover something called “ethics” when deciding to manipulate stocks, much less use someone’s health to do so.
On August 28, 2008, Bloomberg mistakenly published a 2500-word obituary for Steve Jobs.
Suffice to say: Jobs health, especially his “thin” (the shorts prefer “gaunt”) appearance is a lingering issue that can affect Apple’s share prices.
Which brings us to TIME Magazine, a publication with a track record for manipulating photos and attempting to pass it off as fact (see: TIME Magazine’s altered O.J. Simpson mugshot).
In a photo credited to Justin Sullivan/Getty Images, TIME Magazine, despite the history of Jobs health and “thinness,” or perhaps because of it, has altered a photo of Steve Jobs resulting in making him look thinner.
Here’s how TIME Magazine’s online website appears currently:
Here is the original photo from Getty by Justin Sullivan:
The original photo has had its size vertically increased via code in TIME’s website. TIME’s code specifies a width of 307 pixels and a height of 200 pixels, but in order to maintain the proper aspect ratio – in other words present the photo of Jobs as he actually looked at the time it was taken – the dimensions should be 307×175 pixels.
Here are the two photos side-by-side:
TIME’s full article, in which Quittner captions TIME’s altered-photo-falsely-presented-as-fact with prose like this:
• “Jobs has battled pancreatic cancer and has been looking exceptionally thin since the summer.”
• “Steve Dowling, an Apple spokesman, deflected any questions about Jobs’ health. When asked if Jobs canceled because of illness, Dowling said, “Phil is giving the keynote because this is Apple’s last year in the show, and it doesn’t make sense for us to make a major investment in a trade show we will no longer be attending.” Asked again about Jobs’ health, Dowling gave a similar answer, never using the word Jobs or anything related to his condition.”
• “It’s difficult to find a company of Apple’s caliber whose fortunes are so closely tied to the health of its CEO. Apple is Jobs and Jobs is Apple. Unless he makes a public appearance, it’s likely that the news will continue to hammer Apple’s stock, which took a beating Monday after analysts downgraded it.”
• “…Why wait until the last minute and raise the obvious questions about Jobs’s health? The faithful are praying that Tuesday’s announcement is exactly what Apple says it is, and not at all what it looks like.”
MacDailyNews Take: It certainly is “not at all what it looks like.” Despicable. TIME Magazine should be ashamed (if that’s even possible for them anymore). TIME should immediately pull that photo of Steve Jobs and replace it with an actual, unaltered photo. In addition, TIME Magazine should publicly apologize to Apple Inc., Steve Jobs — and Apple shareholders, for that matter.
Please contact TIME Magazine and demand that they “fix” this photo and stop manipulating images and trying to pass them off as reality:
[UPDATE: 9:59am ET: Well, that didn’t take long. Good job everyone! TIME Magazine has now fixed their photo.]
[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Bill” for the heads up.]
Sheer laziness. There are more than enough pics of Gaunt Steve around for them not to have to resort to this.
ok here is another thing…..
If you undergo a whipple procedure, it is not unlike a gastic bypass surgery and it is not uncommon to loose weight! yeesh some people
Oh, and I hope Phil doesn’t take it too hard being a “minor investment”.
What a bunch of Arse Holes!!!!
Another example of journalism at its best!
This, for me, goes far beyond the whispering campaign that certain people are using to manipulate stocks. Why? Because unlike suggesting the man’s ill, this Time they’re actually passing the (pathetically stretched) photo off as physical proof that he is.
It also goes far beyond dirty business practice as well. The man’s human, he has a family who are being subjected to this and the bastards who are doing it should now realise that it’s time to draw a line and call the attack dogs off.
speaking of phil…he has plenty of extra weight to donate to steve…
It’s not the first time they’ve manipulated pics
All that said, I believe Mr. Jobs might consider a different diet. I wish him and all you lot. Merry Christ Mass and Happy Holy Days.
Maybe it’s time we got up a petition to the S.E.C. questioning these attempts to manipulate Apple’s stock prices. It certainly looks like unethical abuse of the market to me.
Typical corporate media tactic. I ignore Time Magazine, as well as the rest of the corporate media world.
Does thinner mean sick?
Steve Jobs needs to go to MacDonalds and chow down on a few cheeseburgers with fries. That’d fix him right up! Cure what ails him!
The editor of Time Magazine must want to drive AAPL stock down so he can buy a few shares. Gotta make some Christmas money.
I am cancelling my subscription to Time as soon as I get home.
Like a lot of my friends, I should’ve done it long ago.
What gets me is they only show one hand in the photo – is Steve missing the other hand?
I don’t know if it’s possible on web software, but I always see people in my work(Tech Publications) stretching photos to fit into picture boxes in InDesign, and not scaling proportionally…
Could be a simple error. But I doubt it.
” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”wink” style=”border:0;” />
@R2 – bet you don’t.
Not only is he getting thinner, he’s caught the dreaded Giraffe Neck Syndrome.
This is the letter I sent to Time. Not only should we all contact them, but also their advertisers. Then they will feel the heat.
“This is to inform you that I am extremely upset by the altered photo of Steve Jobs in your recent article.
I am so upset that I will no longer trust or read your magazine or buy Time Life products. In the past, I have bought
Many hundreds of dollars of Time Life Products. Furthermore I will be sending letters to all of your advertisers.
They should be aware of this unethical action by you. This is HUGE.”
This is probably more a case of a really poor web design or designer where the photo was stretched via HTML code as explained in this piece. I have seen lazy/poor programmers do this – it’s a common thing for Windows/Office wannabee pros in business. lol They probably don’t even know they did this.
Hey MDN, where you as outraged at the rag that distorted John McCain’s photo? Did you call for apologies then?
I agree with MacHTML that this was a coding gaffe.
<b>TIME has already fixed the image.<b>
They’ve fixed it.
Berrylium … hush up, now. My family is busy buying in at the low “distressed value” price. Don’t muck up the works. Just because “they” are manipulating the market does not mean “we” can’t take advantage of their efforts, too.
Wee Man … yes, “thin” means “sick”. That is, if you check the relative health for the four categories in the (in my opinion, silly) BMI scale you will see that “overweight” people are the healthiest and “underweight” people are the least healthy. “Normal” is second and “obese” third. So, now you know. And so should your doctor.
He looks taller.
I just checked the photo in the article and it appears correct and not distorted.