Mossberg: Apple’s Mac OS X Leopard faster, better, far less prone to malware than Windows Vista

The Wall Street Journal’s Walter S. Mossberg is out with his most recent personal computer buyer’s guide.

Mossberg writes, “As always, this is a general guide aimed at mainstream, nontechnical consumers who dwell on common tasks such as email, instant messaging and surfing the Web; managing and lightly editing photos, videos and music; and using basic office applications. It is not intended for heavy gamers, video producers or corporate buyers.”

“In my view, Apple’s Leopard operating system is faster, better and far less prone to malicious software than Microsoft’s Vista operating system. And the Mac laptops also come with better built-in software. The $1,099 MacBook is a solid, fairly priced machine, and the $1,999 MacBook Pro is even better. Both also can run Windows,” Mossberg writes. “But Windows laptops are often less expensive…”

MacDailyNews Take: You get what you pay for; spec out a WIndows laptop that compares with what’s offered in an Apple notebook and check the prices. You’ll likely be very surprised at the Mac’s price-competitiveness. Apple refuses to compete in the bargain basement junk PC market. Apple wants to satisfy customers; they won’t make junk for the sake of low sticker prices. Apple has a reputation for quality that they will not sacrifice to pad their market share numbers like HP, Dell, Gateway, etc.

We can’t ship junk. There are thresholds we can’t cross because of who we are. The difference is, we don’t offer stripped-down, lousy products.Apple CEO Steve Jobs, August 7, 2007

Mossberg continues, “If you’re buying an Apple laptop, two gigabytes of memory is plenty. If you’re using Vista Home Premium, I’d consider three gigabytes for best performance.”

MacDailyNews Take: Don’t forget to factor that extra RAM into the price comparison. While you’re at it, factor in the cost of your time, the cost of Antivirus software and the processor cycles to run it, and the general frustration tax that Windows routinely exacts.

Full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Windows-only users: Get a Mac and you’ll never look back. Don’t just take our word for it — we are MacDailyNews, after all. Don’t even rely on just Walt Mossberg’s advice, either. Instead, please see the wealth of related articles below from an extremely wide variety of sources and you’ll find out pretty quickly that your next computer should be a Mac.

21 Comments

  1. In most cases Windows machines cost less. After that who cares about any competition, be it Apple—if you’re crazy enough to consider puny Crapple competition for the mighty Microsoft—or anyone else.

    Cost trumps speed, ease of use, security, design quality, seamless integration, and my favorite whine from the MAC sheep: “everything just works”. What a bunch of babies. I figure you smug and pretentious MAC lemmings would want to have a little extra money around to buy highfalutin toys so you can parade around town with useless junk. Can’t be any different than owning a sissy MAC.

    Oh, and Mossberg is wrong. Dead wrong.

    Your potential. Our passion.™

  2. Is it just me or does Unkie Mossy just reruns this very same article every couple of months or so?

    MDN, seriously. fix the broken site tables. Repeat after me, CSS is your friend… CSS is your friend…

  3. MacDailyNews Take: You get what you pay for; spec out a WIndows laptop that compares with what’s offered in an Apple notebook and check the prices. You’ll likely be very surprised at the Mac’s price-competitiveness. Apple refuses to compete in the bargain basement junk PC market. Apple wants to satisfy customers; they won’t make junk for the sake of low sticker prices. Apple has a reputation for quality that they will not sacrifice to pad their market share numbers like HP, Dell, Gateway, etc.

    The new 20″ iMac screen ?????????

  4. @tmsruge

    if you take a look at the source (firebug in firefox) you can see that they do use divs and css for their functionality. The problem is that the php script that generates this page has thrown a wobbly over something, closed part of the page structure, then continued generating the comments. Basicly it’s a blind spot in error handling… easy thing to do, though they should use this opportunity to dig throught the code, figure out what’s causing the error, and build an error trap that works around it to continue showing decent information.

    Yah… I’ve done this a few times (used to work for a company that did dynamic websites)

  5. Zune Tang = boring ass.

    I am told I am supposed to laugh and laugh when he writes these all-too-typical troll diatribes. Um, why?

    I can get my fill of insane sadomasochistic troll trash any time I like over at comp.sys.mac.advocacy. Ha ha? Yawn. zzzzzz

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.