Apple considering raise for CEO Steve Jobs?

“After years of drawing just a dollar in salary, Apple CEO Steve Jobs could be in store for a raise,” Tom Krazit reports for CNET News.

MacDailyNews Take: We think Jobs will keep the salary at $1. He seems to like the concept. Other forms of payment, of course, are possible. He’s more than earned it.

Krazit reports, “Apple filed its annual report for its 2007 fiscal year Thursday afternoon, and hinted in a section about executive compensation that Jobs could be in for some real money fairly soon. ‘Because Mr. Jobs’s continued leadership is critical to Apple, the Compensation Committee is considering additional compensation arrangements for him,’ the company wrote.”

MacDailyNews Take: Papa needs a brand new jet. Among other things.

Krazit reports, “Now, it’s not like Jobs is hurting for money. According to Forbes’ most recent list of the world’s billionaires, Jobs ranks 132nd with an estimated net worth of $5.7 billion, $4.7 billion of which comes from holdings in Disney.”

Krazit reports, “The annual report notes that he holds 5.5 million shares of Apple stock through a series of restricted stock awards over the years–some more controversial than others–that have vested. But it also points out that he hasn’t sold a single share of Apple stock in the 10 years since he rejoined the company.”

MacDailyNews Note: 5.5 million shares at yesterday’s closing price of $164.30 is $903.65 million (on paper).

More in the full article here.

31 Comments

  1. – SJ is motivated by leading Apple Inc. to world domination with the largest collection great products ever assembled by one business.

    – It is obvious that he is NOT driven by acquiring wealth.

    – A $ a year is a very loud statement against the huge greed of the Directors of Microsoft.

    – He said it all in his Harvard address of course: http://deimos3.apple.com/WebObjects/Core.woa/Browse/itunes.stanford.edu.1292029264.01292029269.1292846299?i=1411599120

    He’s an exceptional guy no doubt. But (probably) best appreciated at a distance..!

  2. “Well, Steve, you’ve done a pretty good job. We really like what you did with the music thing. So we’re going to give you an 8% raise. That’s 4% higher than average. Sound good? Great. Let’s just work on getting here on time a little better, and try not to forget that paperwork, eh? Heh-heh-heh! Now, get back out there, buddy, and we’ll see you at the meeting Friday morning.”

  3. The $1 salary is ceremonial; it is just enough to generate a W-2 form and to make him an employee. (I have a job with a $1 salary too.) By taking his compensation in stock options, his compensation is tied directly to the company’s performance. When he first came back to Apple, it was a way of putting himself on the line and showing that he was serious about turning the company around.

    Now that Apple is a huge success, I can see why people would want to give him a more conventional compensation package, but I don’t see the point. Money is money, whichever way it comes, but the present setup keeps him motivated to keep improving Apple’s performance.

    Unless Apple is planning on settling in for a long corporate nap, there is no reason to change anything.

  4. If he has 4.7B through Disney (Pixar), then it means that ‘only’ 1B of net worth can be attributed to 30+ years of Apple??? Not that that’s chicken scratch by ANY means, but he IS Apple… thought he’d have more than that.
    Mr. Bill has something like 60B.

  5. I think the ceremonial $1 pa salary should stay. Partly because it makes a statement and also because I agree that his real reward ought to be tied to the companies success.

    Perhaps they should award him without restriction a number of shares of company held stock on an annual basis, say 250,000 ordinary shares annually. At the current value it would be in line with top execs at many other companies and still well below some of the mega figures of some. Yes he would be taxed on it but it would be up to him as to either sell some of the shares to pay the tax or to dip into his own pocket to pay the tax and hang onto the shares.

    Just an idea !!!

  6. An A380? You mean like the one being bought by Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal? A man who, like his country, got filthy rich on an accident of geology. Unlike our Steve who, together with many dedicated people, set out to change the world for the better.

    Gates *has* sold much of his stock, and given even more away to his Foundation. I’d consider it a form of penance if I saw any indication he thought he’d done anything wrong.

  7. “Didn’t he excercise some of his options recently?”

    Yes, but only to pay the taxes due on option that vested and that needed to be exercised or they would expire. Taxes are due when exercised. He had a $300 million tax bill due.

    Also, as to the question raised about Steve having “‘only’ 1B of net worth can be attributed to 30+ years of Apple???”, this is obviously someone who does not know the history of Apple.

    Steve was forced out of the company and sold his shares. He then bought Pixar from George Lucas, and started Next Computers.

    In bringing Steve back to the company, Apple bought Next.

    You know what Steve did with Pixar.

    In the end, all of his worth does stem from what he originally got out of Apple and how he invested that.

  8. I say give him 10 billions dollars. Then he can take that money and install WiFi routers all over the US so that we can get WiFi on our iPhones and iPod Touch anywhere in the US. Set it up so that it will work with Mac only for free, no ads. The rest like Windows users have to PAY!!!

  9. @vlad

    Even if you don’t “need” the cash, you would probably take it, especially if it was earned by performance.

    Apple stock is #2 for total returns over the past 10 years and has created $150 billion in value for investors. This is largely because of Steve, and he deserves something for it, whether he needs it or not. It is a matter of fairness. If he doesn’t need it he can give it away to charity like Bill Gates does. (Whether or not Gates deserves his wealth is a whole other discussion)

  10. Steve deserves every bit as much as any MS exec makes, and even more so because he wouldn’t take it. His compensation is tied to the performance of his company in a way that other CEOs could learn from.

    When I worked for (game publisher owned by major toy company), the CEO of said toy company once took a salary of $1.2M, and was given a bonus of $965K. This was a year when the company didn’t meet sales targets, and regular employees lost their annual bonus. The game division that I worked for did, in fact, make their targets, exceeded them, actually, but we were not rewarded for it. Our regular (generous) performance-based bonus was replaced by a static holiday bonus (basically an extra check), in a sleazy shell-game of accounting tricks. The upshot of all this is that in a year when my division did well, I lost thousands while our fearless leader took home an extra million.

    It’s that sort of thing that really makes your employees hate you and not feel the need to work very hard for you. It amazes me that so few executives understand this,

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.