<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BusinessWeek: Apple&#8217;s new iMac Core Duo is an iMac on Steroids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2006/02/02/businessweek_apples_new_imac_core_duo_is_an_imac_on_steroids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/02/02/businessweek_apples_new_imac_core_duo_is_an_imac_on_steroids/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:23:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LordRobin</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/02/02/businessweek_apples_new_imac_core_duo_is_an_imac_on_steroids/comment-page-1/#comment-228310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LordRobin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=17879#comment-228310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave H:  I&#039;ve been saying exactly the same thing ever since the Intel transition was announced.  The only way I could see Intel-specific DRM being used would be in a dedicated device, not via the Mac.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave H:  I&#8217;ve been saying exactly the same thing ever since the Intel transition was announced.  The only way I could see Intel-specific DRM being used would be in a dedicated device, not via the Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beryllium</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/02/02/businessweek_apples_new_imac_core_duo_is_an_imac_on_steroids/comment-page-1/#comment-228309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beryllium]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=17879#comment-228309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received my new 20&quot; iMac Core Duo yesterday and now that I have my work space back in order I thought I&#039;d take a moment to say a few things about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, it is FAST. But then coming from an aging G4/400 makes it more impressive than if I had had a more recent Power Mac.  I have noticed that most of my applications that run in Rosetta are very speedy and I do not notice too much difference in performance.  So, for the home consumer user at least, Rosetta seems to work fine. Some take a bit longer to launch, but after that they run very well.  Pages from iWork &#039;05 is noticeably slower than the Pages 2 trial copy, so I will update later.  Apps that run in Intel native mode are really fast. Some web sites load instantly in Safari.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, it is quiet. There is no noticeable fan noise, but I have not really pressed it hard yet either, I guess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third, Target Disk Mode made the data transfer a breeze. It saved me hours of data transfers and application installs. Thank you very much, Apple.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad news: Freeway Pro crashes on launch.  I will contact SoftPress and find out what they might know about this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received my new 20&#8243; iMac Core Duo yesterday and now that I have my work space back in order I thought I&#8217;d take a moment to say a few things about it.</p>
<p>First, it is FAST. But then coming from an aging G4/400 makes it more impressive than if I had had a more recent Power Mac.  I have noticed that most of my applications that run in Rosetta are very speedy and I do not notice too much difference in performance.  So, for the home consumer user at least, Rosetta seems to work fine. Some take a bit longer to launch, but after that they run very well.  Pages from iWork &#8217;05 is noticeably slower than the Pages 2 trial copy, so I will update later.  Apps that run in Intel native mode are really fast. Some web sites load instantly in Safari.</p>
<p>Second, it is quiet. There is no noticeable fan noise, but I have not really pressed it hard yet either, I guess.</p>
<p>Third, Target Disk Mode made the data transfer a breeze. It saved me hours of data transfers and application installs. Thank you very much, Apple.</p>
<p>Bad news: Freeway Pro crashes on launch.  I will contact SoftPress and find out what they might know about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave H</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/02/02/businessweek_apples_new_imac_core_duo_is_an_imac_on_steroids/comment-page-1/#comment-228308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=17879#comment-228308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike &lt;b&gt;&quot;The only way that the big Hollywood studios would allow a movie service is with both a hardware and software DRM... Something only the Intel chips will be able to provide&quot;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can&#039;t see it somehow.  Not only do they lock out 30 million potential Mac-owning customers, but virtually the entire Windows-using world.  Unless they aren&#039;t planning to open a Movie store until sometime in 2007 when a lot more people have updated their machines, it doesn&#039;t make sense.  People will just keep buying DVDs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike <b>&#8220;The only way that the big Hollywood studios would allow a movie service is with both a hardware and software DRM&#8230; Something only the Intel chips will be able to provide&#8221;</b></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see it somehow.  Not only do they lock out 30 million potential Mac-owning customers, but virtually the entire Windows-using world.  Unless they aren&#8217;t planning to open a Movie store until sometime in 2007 when a lot more people have updated their machines, it doesn&#8217;t make sense.  People will just keep buying DVDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/02/02/businessweek_apples_new_imac_core_duo_is_an_imac_on_steroids/comment-page-1/#comment-228307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=17879#comment-228307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John, That&#039;s not entirely correct...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from getting faster processors in laptops, Hollywood and movies are one of the main reasons for the Intel switch...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only way that the big Hollywood studios would allow a movie service is with both a hardware and software DRM... Something only the Intel chips will be able to provide.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, That&#8217;s not entirely correct&#8230;</p>
<p>Apart from getting faster processors in laptops, Hollywood and movies are one of the main reasons for the Intel switch&#8230;</p>
<p>The only way that the big Hollywood studios would allow a movie service is with both a hardware and software DRM&#8230; Something only the Intel chips will be able to provide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/02/02/businessweek_apples_new_imac_core_duo_is_an_imac_on_steroids/comment-page-1/#comment-228306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=17879#comment-228306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple computers are already leaders in terms of &quot;media applications&quot; - that was not the reason for the change in processor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple computers are already leaders in terms of &#8220;media applications&#8221; &#8211; that was not the reason for the change in processor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/02/02/businessweek_apples_new_imac_core_duo_is_an_imac_on_steroids/comment-page-1/#comment-228305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=17879#comment-228305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ordered my macbook pro on 01/31/06.  Estimated ship date: 02/26/06.  Estimated delivery date: 03/07/06.  Ground shipping.  No charge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ordered my macbook pro on 01/31/06.  Estimated ship date: 02/26/06.  Estimated delivery date: 03/07/06.  Ground shipping.  No charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Buonarroti</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/02/02/businessweek_apples_new_imac_core_duo_is_an_imac_on_steroids/comment-page-1/#comment-228304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Buonarroti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=17879#comment-228304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He mistakenly states that the MacBook Pro will be out in March. The online Apple Store states the shipping date as February, and I think Steve in his keynote mentioned it as mid-February. Mid-February is what the people at the local Apple store said, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He mistakenly states that the MacBook Pro will be out in March. The online Apple Store states the shipping date as February, and I think Steve in his keynote mentioned it as mid-February. Mid-February is what the people at the local Apple store said, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
