<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: Microsoft scaling back Mac Business Unit, plans to exit consumer Mac software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/</link>
	<description>Apple and Mac News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:58:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Check</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-3/#comment-235611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reality Check]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 06:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much as we all agree on the dubious quality of much of Microsoft&#039;s software, I think noone would also disagree that Microsoft are perhaps No.1 in the industry in terms of their ability to grab market share by fair means or foul.  You can be sure that the more market share Apple acquires, the more Microsoft will pull out the stops to marginalise Apple users.  With a 95% market share, Microsoft still have hell of a lot of scope in this regard.  A percentage increase in Apple&#039;s installed user base doesn&#039;t, frankly, make much odds.  I&#039;m extremely reluctant to feel smug about the demise of Microsoft at this point in time.  The one thing they have consistently excelled at over the past 20 years is wiping out any potential competition.  As suggested above, maybe domination of the DRM multimedia market is shaping up to be the next battleground...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much as we all agree on the dubious quality of much of Microsoft&#8217;s software, I think noone would also disagree that Microsoft are perhaps No.1 in the industry in terms of their ability to grab market share by fair means or foul.  You can be sure that the more market share Apple acquires, the more Microsoft will pull out the stops to marginalise Apple users.  With a 95% market share, Microsoft still have hell of a lot of scope in this regard.  A percentage increase in Apple&#8217;s installed user base doesn&#8217;t, frankly, make much odds.  I&#8217;m extremely reluctant to feel smug about the demise of Microsoft at this point in time.  The one thing they have consistently excelled at over the past 20 years is wiping out any potential competition.  As suggested above, maybe domination of the DRM multimedia market is shaping up to be the next battleground&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the other Mark</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-3/#comment-235610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[the other Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1) Office for Mac is going nowhere. Microsoft makes tons of money off of this. Also, is Microsoft stopped making it there would be a huge possibility of another anti-trust suit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Apple has been slowly firing salvos across Microsoft&#039;s bow for a long time (Quicktime, iTunes, iWork, Safari, etc)  This is the first true response by Microsoft and will most likely not be the last.  Apple has been running around fat and happy for the past few years. Well, the Microsoft giant is waking up and he doesn&#039;t look happy.  Apple will either need to stop aggravating Microsoft or move very ,very fast to stay ahead of the competition. iTunes/iPod is good head start; I&#039;m justnot sure it is enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Office for Mac is going nowhere. Microsoft makes tons of money off of this. Also, is Microsoft stopped making it there would be a huge possibility of another anti-trust suit. </p>
<p>2) Apple has been slowly firing salvos across Microsoft&#8217;s bow for a long time (Quicktime, iTunes, iWork, Safari, etc)  This is the first true response by Microsoft and will most likely not be the last.  Apple has been running around fat and happy for the past few years. Well, the Microsoft giant is waking up and he doesn&#8217;t look happy.  Apple will either need to stop aggravating Microsoft or move very ,very fast to stay ahead of the competition. iTunes/iPod is good head start; I&#8217;m justnot sure it is enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil_MS_User</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-3/#comment-235609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evil_MS_User]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can&#039;t have your cake and eat it, too. All of you obviously hate M$, yet you want it to continue selling software that works on Macs? You want it to die, yet you demand that it continue servicing you? The hypocrisy is astounding...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t have your cake and eat it, too. All of you obviously hate M$, yet you want it to continue selling software that works on Macs? You want it to die, yet you demand that it continue servicing you? The hypocrisy is astounding&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: effwerd</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-3/#comment-235608</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[effwerd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha! MS learned that move from the government.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! MS learned that move from the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth Avenus</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-3/#comment-235607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darth Avenus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to see Apple really stick it to M$.  Apple could buy WordPerfect cheap, and update it so it&#039;s compatible with Word docs and open source docs (like the OpenDocument standard).  This may have been discussed elsewhere, but if Apple could somehow buy Adobe, then that would pretty much take care of the &quot;creative&quot; market.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see Apple really stick it to M$.  Apple could buy WordPerfect cheap, and update it so it&#8217;s compatible with Word docs and open source docs (like the OpenDocument standard).  This may have been discussed elsewhere, but if Apple could somehow buy Adobe, then that would pretty much take care of the &#8220;creative&#8221; market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McDeans</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-3/#comment-235606</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[McDeans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I installed flip4mac yesterday, and now I can&#039;t view the live video stream I used to be able to see with WMP. It appears I can&#039;t uninstall f4m and revert back to where I was before. In short, it&#039;s hosed my system. Bah.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I installed flip4mac yesterday, and now I can&#8217;t view the live video stream I used to be able to see with WMP. It appears I can&#8217;t uninstall f4m and revert back to where I was before. In short, it&#8217;s hosed my system. Bah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flip4mac sucking</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-3/#comment-235605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flip4mac sucking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DRM content...buzz sorry gotta use WMP. Webpage and the link to a media file not working..freezes quicktime AND safari, but wmp opens and tries loading leaving safari free to do whatever.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wish MS would update the whole app and deploy it so I could play all the content I have to deal w/ on the web and from friends. Apple just didn&#039;t seem to get the point about getting QuickTime installed on everything quicktime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can&#039;t underestimate the appeal of M$ w/ playsforsure or whatever that stuff will be. WMP can be decent and a rewrite for 11 on vista/xp will be a pretty decent app. The pure volume of available things (mostly crap) means that there will still be some cool features that itunes doesn&#039;t have and if it works then what&#039;s the problem? The only gotcha is for the people with pcs and macs, otherwise their content works fine on their fake ipods and on their pcs. They can even have both.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So dance the happy stupid dance while a switcher compatibility app disappears. Ok..not getting the glee besides just anti-M$&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now as for the office being discontinued...ok like whatever, they make 1/3rd of their money from it and it costs a hell of a lot more than one or two digital downloads of the latest song. 5 years is enough to have a leopard 64 bit supported native version and there will always be pressure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Too bad this dual boot intel mac will only boot vista and show a much better version of windows than what&#039;s out there today. It would be nice to compare Tiger to XP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But keep droning with that single trackpad button...I love Apple products, but I&#039;m not gonna be suckered into hating something when it&#039;s needed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DRM content&#8230;buzz sorry gotta use WMP. Webpage and the link to a media file not working..freezes quicktime AND safari, but wmp opens and tries loading leaving safari free to do whatever.</p>
<p>I wish MS would update the whole app and deploy it so I could play all the content I have to deal w/ on the web and from friends. Apple just didn&#8217;t seem to get the point about getting QuickTime installed on everything quicktime.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t underestimate the appeal of M$ w/ playsforsure or whatever that stuff will be. WMP can be decent and a rewrite for 11 on vista/xp will be a pretty decent app. The pure volume of available things (mostly crap) means that there will still be some cool features that itunes doesn&#8217;t have and if it works then what&#8217;s the problem? The only gotcha is for the people with pcs and macs, otherwise their content works fine on their fake ipods and on their pcs. They can even have both.</p>
<p>So dance the happy stupid dance while a switcher compatibility app disappears. Ok..not getting the glee besides just anti-M$</p>
<p>Now as for the office being discontinued&#8230;ok like whatever, they make 1/3rd of their money from it and it costs a hell of a lot more than one or two digital downloads of the latest song. 5 years is enough to have a leopard 64 bit supported native version and there will always be pressure.</p>
<p>Too bad this dual boot intel mac will only boot vista and show a much better version of windows than what&#8217;s out there today. It would be nice to compare Tiger to XP.</p>
<p>But keep droning with that single trackpad button&#8230;I love Apple products, but I&#8217;m not gonna be suckered into hating something when it&#8217;s needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jobs</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-3/#comment-235604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hogwash.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hogwash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-3/#comment-235603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[V L C]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>V L C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pog</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-3/#comment-235602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I fail to see how this is a bad thing. No more crappy WMP on Mac, instead we get an excellent plug-in for Quicktime for free that allows us to play all the latest Windows Media Player formats. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As soon as I get home, I&#039;m installing the Flip4Mac QT driver on all my machines and trashing WMP. Can&#039;t wait.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fail to see how this is a bad thing. No more crappy WMP on Mac, instead we get an excellent plug-in for Quicktime for free that allows us to play all the latest Windows Media Player formats. </p>
<p>As soon as I get home, I&#8217;m installing the Flip4Mac QT driver on all my machines and trashing WMP. Can&#8217;t wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dennis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see them dropping Office Student/Teacher version. If students start using a competing product in school, they&#039;re likely to stick with that and not switch to Office if/when they can afford it later. Also, universities are not the customers Microsoft should want to push away. Academics are in a great position to go the open source route and be able to support it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see them dropping Office Student/Teacher version. If students start using a competing product in school, they&#8217;re likely to stick with that and not switch to Office if/when they can afford it later. Also, universities are not the customers Microsoft should want to push away. Academics are in a great position to go the open source route and be able to support it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hedgehogfrenzy</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hedgehogfrenzy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It wouldn&#039;t be a problem to loose WMP if tons of crap on the internet wasn&#039;t encoded in WMP.  I still get multimedia previews of work from clients in WMP.  I have hoped someone would integrate WMP technology into Mac browsers then it is today.  We don&#039;t get current codecs till a year after they&#039;er released, and the player dosen&#039;t interface well with the browser.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wouldn&#8217;t be a problem to loose WMP if tons of crap on the internet wasn&#8217;t encoded in WMP.  I still get multimedia previews of work from clients in WMP.  I have hoped someone would integrate WMP technology into Mac browsers then it is today.  We don&#8217;t get current codecs till a year after they&#8217;er released, and the player dosen&#8217;t interface well with the browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duke</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw the keynote and the head of the MacBU pledged 5 years support for the mac version of Office.  That gives plenty of time for apple to get a substitute ready for Office if/when necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides, if the VMWare/virtualization alternatives that allow Windows apps to run on the new macs pan out, none of this will matter...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the keynote and the head of the MacBU pledged 5 years support for the mac version of Office.  That gives plenty of time for apple to get a substitute ready for Office if/when necessary.</p>
<p>Besides, if the VMWare/virtualization alternatives that allow Windows apps to run on the new macs pan out, none of this will matter&#8230;</p>
<p>D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critic: &lt;br /&gt;
I hate to say it but us Mac users are not a significant enough percentage of potential users to care about for big business such as Hollywood who MS has been courting for many years. I think All of this boils down who&#039;s DRM standards the movie and music industries are going to go with. MS can offer them a much bigger market share with Windows users that will be forced to use WMV with MS&#039;s DRM software. Why should MS make WMV for Macs if Apple is refusing to adopt MS&#039;s DRM? It&#039;s a worthless endevor for them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Critic: <br />
I hate to say it but us Mac users are not a significant enough percentage of potential users to care about for big business such as Hollywood who MS has been courting for many years. I think All of this boils down who&#8217;s DRM standards the movie and music industries are going to go with. MS can offer them a much bigger market share with Windows users that will be forced to use WMV with MS&#8217;s DRM software. Why should MS make WMV for Macs if Apple is refusing to adopt MS&#8217;s DRM? It&#8217;s a worthless endevor for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&quot;WMP wasn&#039;t making MS any money and MS knows that they can&#039;t compete with Quicktime in the OSX platform.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Agreed.  They will continue to produce Office because--let&#039;s face it--they make good money from Office.  I don&#039;t see how the author jumps from &quot;We&#039;re cutting Windows Media Player&quot; to &quot;We&#039;re dropping out of the consumer market.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What Microsoft is arguably doing is dropping out of the &quot;Free software&quot; market, since both WMP and Internet Explorer were free downloads.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The other thing to remember is that, contrary to popular belief, the Mac Business Unit at Microsoft is not responsible for &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; Microsoft software on the Mac.  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if WMP was not produced by the Mac Business Unit (considering how god-awful it is).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frankly, spinning it off to another company is a good thing.  Flip4Mac has some real incentive to create a great codec because they&#039;re making money off the content producers who use Macs (and there are plenty more of them on Macs than Windows).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flip4Mac can also do it &quot;right&quot; without having to worry about internal Microsoft politics.  I see no reason why I shouldn&#039;t be able to play copy-protected WMP music inside iTunes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Microsoft has the incentive to work with Flip4Mac for the same reasons that they had the incentive to do it themselves--more eyeballs means more support for the technology.  However, Microsoft doesn&#039;t necessarily have to invest in the headcount of Mac developers to make it happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;WMP wasn&#8217;t making MS any money and MS knows that they can&#8217;t compete with Quicktime in the OSX platform.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Agreed.  They will continue to produce Office because&#8211;let&#8217;s face it&#8211;they make good money from Office.  I don&#8217;t see how the author jumps from &#8220;We&#8217;re cutting Windows Media Player&#8221; to &#8220;We&#8217;re dropping out of the consumer market.&#8221;</p>
<p>What Microsoft is arguably doing is dropping out of the &#8220;Free software&#8221; market, since both WMP and Internet Explorer were free downloads.</p>
<p>The other thing to remember is that, contrary to popular belief, the Mac Business Unit at Microsoft is not responsible for <i>all</i> Microsoft software on the Mac.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if WMP was not produced by the Mac Business Unit (considering how god-awful it is).</p>
<p>Frankly, spinning it off to another company is a good thing.  Flip4Mac has some real incentive to create a great codec because they&#8217;re making money off the content producers who use Macs (and there are plenty more of them on Macs than Windows).</p>
<p>Flip4Mac can also do it &#8220;right&#8221; without having to worry about internal Microsoft politics.  I see no reason why I shouldn&#8217;t be able to play copy-protected WMP music inside iTunes.</p>
<p>Microsoft has the incentive to work with Flip4Mac for the same reasons that they had the incentive to do it themselves&#8211;more eyeballs means more support for the technology.  However, Microsoft doesn&#8217;t necessarily have to invest in the headcount of Mac developers to make it happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HuskerMac</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HuskerMac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is not a big deal.  5 years is a long way off.  Who knows what business applications will look like by then.  Besides, Apple is a huge part of Microsofts business.  And Microsoft likes money.  So in reality we may be able to buy the buggy piece of crap office suit for the foreseeable future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a big deal.  5 years is a long way off.  Who knows what business applications will look like by then.  Besides, Apple is a huge part of Microsofts business.  And Microsoft likes money.  So in reality we may be able to buy the buggy piece of crap office suit for the foreseeable future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just want to remind you that the ONLY virus for the Mac is a Microsoft Word Macro virus. It&#039;s annoying as hell...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to remind you that the ONLY virus for the Mac is a Microsoft Word Macro virus. It&#8217;s annoying as hell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacDude</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MacDude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;GOOD FSCKING BYE MICROSOFT&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And don&#039;t let the door hit yer assets on the way out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Microsoft - growing old gracefully and handing the reigns to Apple.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apple - to rule the world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>GOOD FSCKING BYE MICROSOFT</b></p>
<p>And don&#8217;t let the door hit yer assets on the way out.</p>
<p>Microsoft &#8211; growing old gracefully and handing the reigns to Apple.</p>
<p>Apple &#8211; to rule the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCCFR</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MCCFR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No official Windows Media Player support from Microsoft! Oh God, say it ain&#039;t so! Won&#039;t somebody think of the children…]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No official Windows Media Player support from Microsoft! Oh God, say it ain&#8217;t so! Won&#8217;t somebody think of the children…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LordRobin</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LordRobin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really don&#039;t see what everyone is getting so upset about.  So Microsoft is &quot;getting out&quot; of consumer Mac software.  How much presence does Microsoft have in &lt;b&gt;consumer&lt;/b&gt; Mac software today?  Not much.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for Microsoft refusing to sell a student/teacher version of Mac Office, that&#039;s really a stretch.  It&#039;s one thing not to waste resources on consumer products for which Apple already bundles superior competitors for free.  It&#039;s quite another to kill a version of software they&#039;re committed to maintaining.  Not much would be gained by killing the student/teacher addition, other than bad publicity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My best guess is that Microsoft is slowly trying to change gears.  They understand that selling software will eventually be a dead-end (how many Office upgrades can they sell?) and that the future is in controlling formats and selling services.  Flip4Mac enables Microsoft&#039;s Windows Media formats to play on the Mac, thus increasing those formats&#039; market.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t see what everyone is getting so upset about.  So Microsoft is &#8220;getting out&#8221; of consumer Mac software.  How much presence does Microsoft have in <b>consumer</b> Mac software today?  Not much.</p>
<p>As for Microsoft refusing to sell a student/teacher version of Mac Office, that&#8217;s really a stretch.  It&#8217;s one thing not to waste resources on consumer products for which Apple already bundles superior competitors for free.  It&#8217;s quite another to kill a version of software they&#8217;re committed to maintaining.  Not much would be gained by killing the student/teacher addition, other than bad publicity.</p>
<p>My best guess is that Microsoft is slowly trying to change gears.  They understand that selling software will eventually be a dead-end (how many Office upgrades can they sell?) and that the future is in controlling formats and selling services.  Flip4Mac enables Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Media formats to play on the Mac, thus increasing those formats&#8217; market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe Apple will just develop and include a WMP plug-in with QuickTime using the current API&#039;s from MS...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
option...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Apple will just develop and include a WMP plug-in with QuickTime using the current API&#8217;s from MS&#8230;</p>
<p>option&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattyg</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mattyg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so much for &quot;so what if apple use intel processors?&quot; i find it quite ironic their leaving somebody else to code their format for macs, least at the bottom line it works and will be updated 10x more often since that it was flip4 does (or whatever their called) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i do think this year will be the drm war&#039;s close and i think it&#039;s going to be a massive bang&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
my money is on apple]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so much for &#8220;so what if apple use intel processors?&#8221; i find it quite ironic their leaving somebody else to code their format for macs, least at the bottom line it works and will be updated 10x more often since that it was flip4 does (or whatever their called) </p>
<p>i do think this year will be the drm war&#8217;s close and i think it&#8217;s going to be a massive bang</p>
<p>my money is on apple</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacMan</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MacMan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I think that this strategy may implode in a couple of years.  As Apple gains more market share, especially in the home and entertainment venues, MS is cutting themselves out of the future revenues from the burgeoning Apple expansion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their efforts to prop up the ever struggling Windows franchize will end up excluding them from the home and entertainment market, with Apple taking the cake.  Microsoft will only be left with the business world, unless Apple begins to move that direction or you can run MS apps on OS X natively or through universal binaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MDN Magic Word -- &quot;Sales&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think that this strategy may implode in a couple of years.  As Apple gains more market share, especially in the home and entertainment venues, MS is cutting themselves out of the future revenues from the burgeoning Apple expansion. </p>
<p>Their efforts to prop up the ever struggling Windows franchize will end up excluding them from the home and entertainment market, with Apple taking the cake.  Microsoft will only be left with the business world, unless Apple begins to move that direction or you can run MS apps on OS X natively or through universal binaries.</p>
<p>MDN Magic Word &#8212; &#8220;Sales&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: critic</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[critic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dropping WMP is a little troubling, but could help Apple in the long run.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are a developer, are you going to put out a product (or design a web site for a client) that can&#039;t be addressed by a significant percentage of potential customers.  How can anyone justify that on a business level, when there are other tools out there like Quicktime, Real, or Flash that are cross platform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Personally, I think this is a dumba** move on MS&#039;s part.  You can already see the grip of their proprietary standards loosening if you look at web statistics on a month-month basis.  IE keeps losing share.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dropping WMP is a little troubling, but could help Apple in the long run.</p>
<p>If you are a developer, are you going to put out a product (or design a web site for a client) that can&#8217;t be addressed by a significant percentage of potential customers.  How can anyone justify that on a business level, when there are other tools out there like Quicktime, Real, or Flash that are cross platform.</p>
<p>Personally, I think this is a dumba** move on MS&#8217;s part.  You can already see the grip of their proprietary standards loosening if you look at web statistics on a month-month basis.  IE keeps losing share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeke</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bye-bye WMP!  Don&#039;t let the door hit you in the butt on the way out.  Good riddance!  As a media player it sucks.  QT with the h.264 codec is so many light years better I don&#039;t even bother trying to view pages that require WMP.  I do send them nasty notes though. We all need to be vocal about this.  I reamed my bank because their on-line banking used to require Windows IE. I pointed out that I REFUSE to use IE for security reasons, and told them I&#039;d be switching banks.  They said they would look into it and 30 days later I was able to use Safari.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bye-bye WMP!  Don&#8217;t let the door hit you in the butt on the way out.  Good riddance!  As a media player it sucks.  QT with the h.264 codec is so many light years better I don&#8217;t even bother trying to view pages that require WMP.  I do send them nasty notes though. We all need to be vocal about this.  I reamed my bank because their on-line banking used to require Windows IE. I pointed out that I REFUSE to use IE for security reasons, and told them I&#8217;d be switching banks.  They said they would look into it and 30 days later I was able to use Safari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWidgetHeHasNot</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AWidgetHeHasNot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As much as Microsoft would love to damage Apple by actually cancelling OfficeMac entirely, the Antitrust folks would go apeshit if they tried to pull that one.  Microsoft appears to be bound to Apple, like it or not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Personally, I think the U.S. Antitrust regulators are pussies and they should have broken Microsoft into three, preferably four companies.  Microsoft don’t appear to have learnt the lesson the original Antitrust cases were there to teach.  They are STILL behaving so badly it makes me sick!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe innovation comes through competition and Microsoft has such a large capitalisation that good ideas can’t filter through to those who write the code.  I’ve been saying for at least five years that there would be web/office convergence.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now Apple has Intel processors it’s one less “perception” barrier too overcome.  Seeing what Apple can do in iWeb I wish they would develop a professional web design package.  Think how good that would be?  It would eat Dreamweaver in a second!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as Microsoft would love to damage Apple by actually cancelling OfficeMac entirely, the Antitrust folks would go apeshit if they tried to pull that one.  Microsoft appears to be bound to Apple, like it or not.  </p>
<p>Personally, I think the U.S. Antitrust regulators are pussies and they should have broken Microsoft into three, preferably four companies.  Microsoft don’t appear to have learnt the lesson the original Antitrust cases were there to teach.  They are STILL behaving so badly it makes me sick!</p>
<p>I believe innovation comes through competition and Microsoft has such a large capitalisation that good ideas can’t filter through to those who write the code.  I’ve been saying for at least five years that there would be web/office convergence.  </p>
<p>Now Apple has Intel processors it’s one less “perception” barrier too overcome.  Seeing what Apple can do in iWeb I wish they would develop a professional web design package.  Think how good that would be?  It would eat Dreamweaver in a second!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEG</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JEG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No big deal here guys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Windows Media Player was god awful in the Mac. Office is the critical app and it will continue for another 5 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WMP wasn&#039;t making MS any money and MS knows that they can&#039;t compete with Quicktime in the OSX platform.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No big deal here guys.</p>
<p>Windows Media Player was god awful in the Mac. Office is the critical app and it will continue for another 5 years. </p>
<p>WMP wasn&#8217;t making MS any money and MS knows that they can&#8217;t compete with Quicktime in the OSX platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This is BAD</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[This is BAD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a BIG DEAL to the many, many Mac users who are students, professors/teachers, small businesses or consultants. The student/teacher version of Office is VERY important to making Office affordable for such users. Looks like M$ is worried and wants to ensure that Macs are more expensive. The only possible hope is M$&#039; recent announcement that it would release publicly all the proprietary code related to compatibility with Word (or, hopefully, Office); if so, maybe Apple can build in FULL compatibility with Office into iWork.  In a business setting, it is absolutely ESSENTIAL to be able to exchange files seamlessly with Windows users.&lt;br /&gt;
Further, a Mac version of WMP is also very important to consumers, given the many commercial websites that only provide WMA formatted files. It is much too unreliable to count on a third-party vendor whose app can easily be broken by   Apple updates to Quicktime, and who could also disappear at any point. &lt;br /&gt;
So, M$ is upping the ante. If Apple&#039;s not in a &quot;hot&quot; war yet with M$, it surely is a &quot;cold&quot; one. And that is NOT good for many Mac users.&lt;br /&gt;
Jake]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a BIG DEAL to the many, many Mac users who are students, professors/teachers, small businesses or consultants. The student/teacher version of Office is VERY important to making Office affordable for such users. Looks like M$ is worried and wants to ensure that Macs are more expensive. The only possible hope is M$&#8217; recent announcement that it would release publicly all the proprietary code related to compatibility with Word (or, hopefully, Office); if so, maybe Apple can build in FULL compatibility with Office into iWork.  In a business setting, it is absolutely ESSENTIAL to be able to exchange files seamlessly with Windows users.<br />
Further, a Mac version of WMP is also very important to consumers, given the many commercial websites that only provide WMA formatted files. It is much too unreliable to count on a third-party vendor whose app can easily be broken by   Apple updates to Quicktime, and who could also disappear at any point. <br />
So, M$ is upping the ante. If Apple&#8217;s not in a &#8220;hot&#8221; war yet with M$, it surely is a &#8220;cold&#8221; one. And that is NOT good for many Mac users.<br />
Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flappo</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flappo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[its obv&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
they realise apple will OWN the consumer space and they will be left with the business lot&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
they&#039;ve given up&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
just wait until we see leopard vs the joke they dredge up]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its obv</p>
<p>they realise apple will OWN the consumer space and they will be left with the business lot</p>
<p>they&#8217;ve given up</p>
<p>just wait until we see leopard vs the joke they dredge up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Peabody</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-2/#comment-235582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Peabody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an addendum to my earlier post:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that MS would publicly promise support for the Mac and promptly begin to withdraw support is just SOP for MS when they want to make sure a competitor remembers who&#039;s in charge of the market place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I personally want to see WMP go away.  I think that QT has always been ready to be the default media player for all PC platforms - and now more than ever.  Of course MS will never let this happen, period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In attitude I&#039;ve tried to be friendly toward WMP just because it gives me some common ground with Windows heads, but the truth is, its such a closed and rudimentary desktop media player that I view it as just being a toy and pretty much non-threatening to QT in a serious way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an addendum to my earlier post:</p>
<p>The fact that MS would publicly promise support for the Mac and promptly begin to withdraw support is just SOP for MS when they want to make sure a competitor remembers who&#8217;s in charge of the market place.</p>
<p>I personally want to see WMP go away.  I think that QT has always been ready to be the default media player for all PC platforms &#8211; and now more than ever.  Of course MS will never let this happen, period.</p>
<p>In attitude I&#8217;ve tried to be friendly toward WMP just because it gives me some common ground with Windows heads, but the truth is, its such a closed and rudimentary desktop media player that I view it as just being a toy and pretty much non-threatening to QT in a serious way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macaday</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Macaday]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s obvious that Microsoft needs to put all its efforts into patching up a versions of Windows that isn&#039;t going to be continually criticised in the face of comparisons with OS X...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s obvious that Microsoft needs to put all its efforts into patching up a versions of Windows that isn&#8217;t going to be continually criticised in the face of comparisons with OS X&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zupchuck</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zupchuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the other Mark,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are on the mark about the battle over the living room, IMHO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the other Mark,</p>
<p>You are on the mark about the battle over the living room, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[one of the reasons i suspect WMP is out is cuz they are up to v11 on windows (to be released this or next month) and it will be a complete revamp and a big competitor to apple&#039;s itunes...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one of the reasons i suspect WMP is out is cuz they are up to v11 on windows (to be released this or next month) and it will be a complete revamp and a big competitor to apple&#8217;s itunes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: editg</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it&#039;s only a matter of time, before Microsuck backs away from Apple all together...it is a this point that iWork, I hope will be ready for call of duty...I feel that iWork was more of a labor of necessity , instead of labor of love (iLife is a labor of love)...I think Apple can see that the roses are changing color and at some point they will die..in which case, Appleworks won&#039;t cut it -- &lt;br /&gt;
iWorks Pro with Numbers, Pages Pro, Keynote Pro will have to quickly become the next Office.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s only a matter of time, before Microsuck backs away from Apple all together&#8230;it is a this point that iWork, I hope will be ready for call of duty&#8230;I feel that iWork was more of a labor of necessity , instead of labor of love (iLife is a labor of love)&#8230;I think Apple can see that the roses are changing color and at some point they will die..in which case, Appleworks won&#8217;t cut it &#8212; <br />
iWorks Pro with Numbers, Pages Pro, Keynote Pro will have to quickly become the next Office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Microsoft continues to sign up internet content providers like they have with MTV, Mac users could find them selves being shut out more and more. Pretty soon it won&#039;t matter if there is a Windows Media player for Mac users because MS is on a track to make all content played on their player protected by thier DRM software which will probably NEVER be supported by Apple. I found it interesting when I went to the MTV website to look at a clip from thier Laguna Beach show (I know that sounds lame but I&#039;m a sucker for trashy TV) there was a window that said I could not watch anything on their site because Macs don&#039;t support MS&#039;s DRM. Well it was no surprise that that was the case. I did think it was kinda rude though that along with the big F you to mac users there was a little sad Mac icon in the same window. The DRM wars are coming to a boil. Get ready for a bumpy ride.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Microsoft continues to sign up internet content providers like they have with MTV, Mac users could find them selves being shut out more and more. Pretty soon it won&#8217;t matter if there is a Windows Media player for Mac users because MS is on a track to make all content played on their player protected by thier DRM software which will probably NEVER be supported by Apple. I found it interesting when I went to the MTV website to look at a clip from thier Laguna Beach show (I know that sounds lame but I&#8217;m a sucker for trashy TV) there was a window that said I could not watch anything on their site because Macs don&#8217;t support MS&#8217;s DRM. Well it was no surprise that that was the case. I did think it was kinda rude though that along with the big F you to mac users there was a little sad Mac icon in the same window. The DRM wars are coming to a boil. Get ready for a bumpy ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the other Mark</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[the other Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Microsoft has backed out of future releases of Windows Media Player for Mac&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is about the battle over the living room. Apple has stepped on Microsoft&#039;s toes with the success of iPod/iTunes/Quicktime.  Microsoft is using whatever clout they have to &quot;force&quot; the masses to stay with Microsoft due to WMP. The are just drawing a line in the sand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BTW, don&#039;t believe that Microsoft is going to stop supporting Office for Mac; they make too much money from it. WMP was free. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MW: &quot;makes&quot; as in Makes sense to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Microsoft has backed out of future releases of Windows Media Player for Mac&#8221;</p>
<p>This is about the battle over the living room. Apple has stepped on Microsoft&#8217;s toes with the success of iPod/iTunes/Quicktime.  Microsoft is using whatever clout they have to &#8220;force&#8221; the masses to stay with Microsoft due to WMP. The are just drawing a line in the sand. </p>
<p>BTW, don&#8217;t believe that Microsoft is going to stop supporting Office for Mac; they make too much money from it. WMP was free. </p>
<p>MW: &#8220;makes&#8221; as in Makes sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honestly, since getting Pages, I haven&#039;t loaded Microsoft Word up at all. I use either Pages or InDesign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MDN Magic Word: &quot;Using&quot; as in &quot;I&#039;m not using Microsoft products&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, since getting Pages, I haven&#8217;t loaded Microsoft Word up at all. I use either Pages or InDesign.</p>
<p>MDN Magic Word: &#8220;Using&#8221; as in &#8220;I&#8217;m not using Microsoft products&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LinuxGuy</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LinuxGuy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is where Apple and the open source community can play a win/win game. Open Office is gaining world wide support from those fed up with MicroSoft&#039;s thuggery. Apple should do nothing to hinder OO and at some point Apple should pour on the support for OO. Apple is a hardware company that uses outstanding system software to sell outstanding hardware. Free Open Source Software (FOSS) is not a threat to Apple, but an ally.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is where Apple and the open source community can play a win/win game. Open Office is gaining world wide support from those fed up with MicroSoft&#8217;s thuggery. Apple should do nothing to hinder OO and at some point Apple should pour on the support for OO. Apple is a hardware company that uses outstanding system software to sell outstanding hardware. Free Open Source Software (FOSS) is not a threat to Apple, but an ally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[um.. the only thing that matters, Office, is on board for 5 years..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hmm pullling back on MSN Messenger? Who fuckin cares &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh wait.. that&#039;s part of office..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
pulling back on WMP?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That kinda sucks, but the format&#039;s not hugely important anyway.. It&#039;s baffling that MS would think Apple&#039;s not a platform they want to support for digital media]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um.. the only thing that matters, Office, is on board for 5 years..</p>
<p>hmm pullling back on MSN Messenger? Who fuckin cares </p>
<p>Oh wait.. that&#8217;s part of office..</p>
<p>pulling back on WMP?</p>
<p>That kinda sucks, but the format&#8217;s not hugely important anyway.. It&#8217;s baffling that MS would think Apple&#8217;s not a platform they want to support for digital media</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Peabody</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235572</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Peabody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My feelings are with &quot;huh?&quot; on this one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, working in the post production side of a multimedia organization I can tell you that, the fact that we have WMP for Mac (as little a thing as that seems), is what keeps us ever so slowly but surely getting more people, in graphics and editing, onboard with Macs in our organization.  I don&#039;t mean that WMP does this single handedly, but it, along with other seemingly benign cross-platform thingys really does help.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More and more the howling of the IT people (basically they&#039;re all MS priests), in the halls of our institution are being quieted.  We have one IT person that actually offers to help the Mac users in our building now.  This was a huge leap for our company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, I thought that the word processor in iWork is able to share documents directly with MS Word - You mean it can&#039;t?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My feelings are with &#8220;huh?&#8221; on this one.</p>
<p>However, working in the post production side of a multimedia organization I can tell you that, the fact that we have WMP for Mac (as little a thing as that seems), is what keeps us ever so slowly but surely getting more people, in graphics and editing, onboard with Macs in our organization.  I don&#8217;t mean that WMP does this single handedly, but it, along with other seemingly benign cross-platform thingys really does help.</p>
<p>More and more the howling of the IT people (basically they&#8217;re all MS priests), in the halls of our institution are being quieted.  We have one IT person that actually offers to help the Mac users in our building now.  This was a huge leap for our company.</p>
<p>By the way, I thought that the word processor in iWork is able to share documents directly with MS Word &#8211; You mean it can&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artist</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Artist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So MS is cutting back support as Mac market share increases. Sounds like MS is starting to worry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So MS is cutting back support as Mac market share increases. Sounds like MS is starting to worry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liver</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[liver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it&#039;s hard to beat office word and excel. apple has a few years of development before they top Excel. Hoep they could do it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s hard to beat office word and excel. apple has a few years of development before they top Excel. Hoep they could do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A consumer exit</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A consumer exit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just means they are getting rid of people--it doesn&#039;t mean they can&#039;t keep selling a student-priced version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chicken little, much?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just means they are getting rid of people&#8211;it doesn&#8217;t mean they can&#8217;t keep selling a student-priced version.</p>
<p>Chicken little, much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Backing out of Apple support is the first sign of a company decline.  MS here is still going strong with what matters, and a Quicktime plugin makes things seamless unless that Flip company fails to update the plugin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MS may be on thin ice but they are still providing what matters -- Office and MSN support.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Backing out of Apple support is the first sign of a company decline.  MS here is still going strong with what matters, and a Quicktime plugin makes things seamless unless that Flip company fails to update the plugin.</p>
<p>MS may be on thin ice but they are still providing what matters &#8212; Office and MSN support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The MacDaddy-Oh!</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The MacDaddy-Oh!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like somebody&#039;s feelings are hurt...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like somebody&#8217;s feelings are hurt&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buy it</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[buy it]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[may be apple should buy out the microsoft mac business unit, and license the window&#039;s technology. or why not just license technology to so that iwork can import and export word, excell, and powerpoint.  we all know that window&#039;s media can&#039;t hold water compaired to quicktime, but a larger share of websites are starting to be wma only (i.e comedy central) flip4mac is great, but if quicktime was able to import/export wma natively even better.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
mw &quot;corner&quot; as in microshaft is in a corner.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>may be apple should buy out the microsoft mac business unit, and license the window&#8217;s technology. or why not just license technology to so that iwork can import and export word, excell, and powerpoint.  we all know that window&#8217;s media can&#8217;t hold water compaired to quicktime, but a larger share of websites are starting to be wma only (i.e comedy central) flip4mac is great, but if quicktime was able to import/export wma natively even better.</p>
<p>mw &#8220;corner&#8221; as in microshaft is in a corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huh?</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huh?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[who gives a f*** about microsoft.&lt;br /&gt;
i dont need their crap!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who gives a f*** about microsoft.<br />
i dont need their crap!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CandT</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CandT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They Suck]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They Suck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mugwump</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mugwump]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It goes against the DNA of Microsoft to not provide software to computer customers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They better watch their step or they will implode.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It goes against the DNA of Microsoft to not provide software to computer customers.</p>
<p>They better watch their step or they will implode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davida</title>
		<link>http://macdailynews.com/2006/01/12/report_microsoft_scaling_back_mac_business_unit_plans_to_exit_consumer_mac/comment-page-1/#comment-235562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davida]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/macdailynews/?p=18135#comment-235562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[meh... maybe Apple will know get cracking on their own Biz suite.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meh&#8230; maybe Apple will know get cracking on their own Biz suite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
