Microsoft Windows average ‘survival time’ rises to 40 minutes for unprotected PC to become infected

“According to the latest data at the SANS Internet Storm Center, the average time it takes for an unprotected PC running Microsoft Windows (i.e., firewall off and missing critical security patches) to be compromised after being plugged into the Internet has more than doubled since September 2004. Trouble is, that time gap still isn’t that large: An unguarded Windows computer can expect to be hacked within little more than 40 minutes of going online,” Brian Krebs reports for The Washington Post.

“The ‘survival time’ of Windows PCs has been steadily on the rise since last fall, when Microsoft released Service Pack 2, a comprehensive security upgrade for Windows XP that made it easier for users to take advantage of the operating system’s built-in firewall, as well as automate the installation of security patches,” Krebs reports. “While Service Pack 2’s deployment may explain the survival time in part, the data may also reflect another trend, according to Chicago-based security services firm LURHQ. In the latest edition of the company’s ‘On the Radar’ newletter, LURHQ analysts point to the ‘the lack of any new critical network-based vulnerabilities in Windows workstations since the LSASS exploit.'”

Full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Wow, a whole 40 minutes?! Excellent work, Microsoft, as usual. If you want to surf the ‘Net with impunity, get a Macintosh.

Related MacDailyNews articles:
Windows PC security company’s switch to Apple Mac causes overwhelming reaction – May 28, 2005
Mad as hell Windows PC security company finally just gives up, switches to Apple Mac OS X – May 25, 2005
Chicago Sun-Times: Mac OS X Tiger shows ‘there’s never been a more compelling time to switch to Mac’ – May 05, 2005
Dan Gillmor: ‘With Mac OS X Tiger, Apple is plainly in the lead today’ – May 05, 2005
Jupiter Research VP: Apple’s Mac OS X Tiger ‘runs rings around Microsoft Windows’ – May 04, 2005
The Independent: Apple’s ‘faster, smarter, simpler’ Mac OS X Tiger ‘a must-have’ – May 04, 2005
Mac OS X Tiger review for a Windows PC audience finds Tiger’s ‘far, far better than Windows XP’ – May 03, 2005
Longhorn mentioned in nearly every Apple Mac OS X Tiger review to assuage Windows masses – May 02, 2005
Boston Herald: Mac OS X Tiger should compel Windows PC users to think about switching to Apple Mac – May 02, 2005
Mac OS X Tiger will likely improve performance of your Macintosh – April 30, 2005
PC World review gives Apple’s Mac OS X Tiger 4.5 stars out of 5 – April 30, 2005
Forrester analysts: Apple should advertise Mac OS X Tiger on television and in movie theaters – April 29, 2005
Ars Technica: Mac OS X Tiger ‘at least twice as significant as any single past update’ – April 28, 2005
BusinessWeek: ‘Tiger bolsters Mac OS X’s edge as the best personal-computer operating system around’ – April 28, 2005
Associated Press: Mac OS X Tiger ‘provides another excellent incentive to switch from Windows’ – April 28, 2005
Mossberg: Apple’s Tiger ‘the best, most advanced personal computer operating system on the market’ – April 28, 2005
InformationWeek columnist: Apple’s Mac OS X Tiger ‘a compelling upgrade’ – April 28, 2005
NY Times: Apple’s Mac OS X Tiger is the most secure, stable and satisfying OS on earth – April 28, 2005
CNET: ‘If you’re tired of Microsoft’s promises, Mac OS X Tiger may be your best incentive to switch’ – April 28, 2005
Wired News: Apple’s Mac OS X Tiger ‘full of welcome surprises’ – April 27, 2005
You can switch from Windows to superior Apple Mac and still be compatible with the world – April 23, 2005
Apple posts QuickTime movies of Mac OS X Tiger features in action – April 13, 2005
Switching from Windows to Mac? Save money by asking to ‘crossgrade’ your software – April 12, 2005
Windows spyware mess is out of control, get a Mac and surf with impunity – December 21, 2004
New Microsoft Internet Explorer exploit spoofs Web sites on fully patched Windows XP systems – December 17, 2004
Microsoft may charge extra for Windows spyware protection software – December 16, 2004
Detroit Free Press: Windows malware problem getting worse, it’s time to get a Mac instead – December 16, 2004
Sick of spyware, adware headaches? Get a Mac and surf the Internet freely – December 13, 2004
Mossberg: Windows PCs plagued with problems, Apple’s Mac is ‘rock solid, elegant and affordable’ – December 09, 2004
Security expert: Don’t use Microsoft Windows, Office, Outlook, Internet Explorer – December 09, 2004
Security test: Windows XP system easily compromised while Apple’s Mac OS X stands safe and secure – November 30, 2004
Sick of spyware, adware infecting your PC? Don’t fret, just get a Mac – November 01, 2004
Microsoft: The safest way to run Windows is on your Mac – October 08, 2004
Spyware plagues Windows users while Mac users surf Net with impunity – November 01, 2004
Ballmer blames Windows users for not upgrading systems as Microsoft’s biggest security problem – October 22, 2004
Windows users line up to pay for spyware removal; Mac users surf Web with impunity – October 18, 2004
Microsoft: The safest way to run Windows is on your Mac – October 08, 2004
Windows users’ security woes spark interest in Apple’s secure Mac OS X – October 06, 2004
Windows desktop monopoly threatened by secure, safe Apple Mac OS X – October 04, 2004
Even Bill Gates can’t avoid Windows malware; Mac users surf the Web freely – October 03, 2004
Cyber-security adviser uses Apple Macintosh to avoid Windows’ security woes – September 27, 2004
Information Security Investigator says switch from Windows to Mac OS X for security – September 24, 2004
Mossberg: Apple iMac G5 ‘powerful, affordable, virus-free with better, more modern OS than Windows XP’ – September 23, 2004
USA Today: people are switching from Windows to Mac because of security issues – September 21, 2004
Windows besieged by hackers; number of Windows viruses soars by more than 400% – September 20, 2004
USA Today columinst angry about Windows viruses, adware, spyware – September 15, 2004
University of Chicago recommends all students patch Windows at least once a day – September 14, 2004
Windows XP worm speaks to users as it deletes their files; Macintosh unaffected – September 13, 2004
Security is top priority in Apple’s Mac OS X – September 12, 2004
Millions of Windows PC’s hijacked by hackers, turned into zombies; Macintosh unaffected – September 08, 2004
Mossberg: Dump your Windows machine and get an Apple Macintosh to free yourself of spyware – August 25, 2004
Tired of patching patches to patch Windows patches? Writer suggests getting a Mac – August 03, 2004
Windows ‘Scob’ virus designed to steal financial data, passwords; Macintosh unaffected – June 26, 2004
Gartner: Worms jack up the total cost of Microsoft Windows – May 07, 2004
Spyware, adware plague Windows users online; Mac OS X users surf freely – April 19, 2004
SmartMoney: Long-suffering Windows users can only dare to dream of Mac’s ease-of-use – February 12, 2004
Mac OS X has no viruses; what’s wrong with Windows? – February 11, 2004
Gates: Windows ‘by far the most secure’ system; tries to use ‘Mac OS X secure through obscurity’ myth – January 27, 2004
Columnist tries the ‘security through obscurity’ myth to defend Windows vs. Macs on virus front – October 1, 2003
New York Times: Mac OS X ‘much more secure than Windows XP’ – September 18, 2003
Wall Street Journal’s Mossberg on making the switch from Windows to Mac – September 18, 2003
Fortune columnist: ‘get a Mac’ to thwart viruses; right answer for the wrong reasons – September 02, 2003
Shattering the Mac OS X ‘security through obscurity’ myth – August 28, 2003
Is Mac OS X really inherently more secure than Windows? – August 26, 2003
Chicago Sun-Times columnist: Windows ‘many holes in its security’ but ‘none of my Macs have ever been affected – August 26, 2003
Sick of worms and viruses? ‘Move to Mac OS X’ suggests Chicago Tribune columnist – August 25, 2003
Virus and worm problems not just due to market share; Windows inherently insecure vs. Mac OS X – August 24, 2003

29 Comments

  1. Yeah, and I can break into any house with an alarm in less time than that…

    A computers security is only as good as its owner. Start giving passwords away for your mac, and it becomes just as vulnerable…Not that anyone would ever do that….” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />

    But for some reason, when I built my girlfriends last computer, It was on the net for about 4 hrs before it began to update….It never was infected…

    Being on the “net” and being on a network are two different things. The ISP’s should be filtering this kind of shit, and most do. Obviously some do not.

  2. Is 40 minutes for a SP2 Win XP system? Is SP2 a critical update? The article didn’t seem to state that clearly. If that is for a SP2 system, that is pathetic. I wouldn’t be surprised that the time for an unpatched pre-SP2 system to increase since last year since there haven’t been the huge outbreaks since last year. There are still plenty out there, but not the ones bringing down entire organizations.

    Kind of funny since I just noticed that I accidently forgot to turn my firewall back on after testing some stuff last month. 30 days (~43,000 minutes) with my Mac turned on, plugged into the internet and nothing happened.

  3. Only 2 virus infections since Nov ’93 … and both happened
    on my old 68k running OS 7.1

    Nothing since then tho… !!

    Gee … I wonder sputnik can make the same claim ?

  4. That’s OK. My firewall was off for, oh geez, as long as I had OS X because I never knew it was there. Turned it on just a few months back. Never had an issue.

  5. They have doubled the virus free up time in 9 months. Great accomplishment. We are all very proud.

    One woman, with 15 minutes help from a man, can produce another human being in that time. Microsoft with all of it’s crack coders and billions of dollars can produce 20 more minutes of freedom.

    Microsoft could eliminate all of their customers virus worries by sending every Windows user the following three word email.

    Buy a Mac.

  6. This update just in from the International Consortium On Security And Quality (ICSQ), Windows is shit.

    In case you didn’t know.

    ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”raspberry” style=”border:0;” />

  7. Only 2 virus infections since Nov ’93 … and both happened
    on my old 68k running OS 7.1

    ——

    Huh? Back in the day, when there was still puny marketshare.. there were virii..

    Interesting.. I’m sure someone really intelligent could deduce something brilliant from that observation, but my brain is all used up..

    Maybe it means that.. er.. no.. it can’t be that…not the obscurity myth..

  8. From the article:

    “All of which should serve as yet another reminder of how important it is for Windows users to take basic, preventative measures to stay safe online. If you need help with the basics, like choosing and installing a firewall, anti-virus software, and Windows updates, have a look at our video guides for securing your computer.”

    Okay, this is a great point. But why the hell doesn’t Microsoft be the one educating? Maybe there should be a Surgeon General’s type of warning posted on operating systems. And obviously just Microsoft’s.

    Like Al said – “Buy a Mac.”

  9. From the article:

    “All of which should serve as yet another reminder of how important it is for Windows users to take basic, preventative measures to stay safe online. If you need help with the basics, like choosing and installing a firewall, anti-virus software, and Windows updates, have a look at our video guides for securing your computer.”

    I hope the hapless Windows-user can do all of the above within the 40-minute time limit.

    I followed a few links in the referenced article and made my way to a 13-page set of instructions published by the SANS Internet Storm Center with the title, “Windows XP: Surviving the First Day”.

    http://www.sans.org/rr/whitepapers/windows/1298.php

    Imagine purchasing an automobile and reading the owner’s manual containing a statement like, “Surviving the first day in your new car”!

  10. but MS is getting better. It will be a whole day eventually, and then why buy a Mac? ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />

  11. Yes, a PSA showing what happens when you plug both a Mac and a Windows PC in and connect them to the internet. The Windows PC gets hacked, the Mac just runs.Then quotes from recent glowing reviews of Mac OS X.

    That would get PC users thinking. What do u think?

  12. The only reason why it now takes 40 minutes: All serious hackers all over the world have hacked an army of Windows-drones yet, they can command for every purpose. So the remaining hacking-load is generated by hobby-hackers in high-schools, universities etc., who are less agressive.

  13. So these guys turn the firewall off, and turn the automated patching off (both are on by default in SP2) then claim that those devices don’t work to protect the PC…

    I guess they also turn the airbags off in their cars, and complain when they fail to deploy in an accident, and walk outside in the rain with a closed umbrella and blame some “umbrella design defect” as the reason they’re getting wet.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.