“Apple Computer plans to announce Monday that it’s scrapping its partnership with IBM and switching its computers to Intel’s microprocessors, CNET News.com has learned. Apple plans to move lower-end computers such as the Mac Mini to Intel chips in mid-2006 and higher-end models such as the Power Mac in mid-2007, sources said,” Stephen Shankland reports for CNET News.
“The announcement is expected Monday at Apple’s Worldwide Developer Conference in San Francisco, at which Chief Executive Steve Jobs is giving the keynote speech. The conference would be an appropriate venue: Changing the chips would require programmers to rewrite their software to take full advantage of the new processor,” Shankland reports. “IBM, Intel and Apple declined to comment for this story.”
Full article here.
MacDailyNews Take: If true, Steve, you got a lot of ‘splainin’ to do! Jobs better turn the RDF up to 11 for his keynote. Hopefully, Intel has something in the “top secret room” that’s better than what they’ve currently got on the market. We can’t wait to see if Jobs allows “Intel Inside” stickers to be slapped on Macintosh cases. Note that the CNET article doesn’t state any specific type(s) of Intel processor(s) to which Apple will switch.
One very interesting aspect of all this, if it were to happen that Apple Macs use the same processors as the Wintel box assemblers, is that it would all but eliminate the “my PC is faster” argument and the real difference between Macs and Wintel PCs would be focused like a laser on what the real difference has been all along: the operating system. Obviously, to have the operating system as the main differentiator between, for example, a Dell PC running Windows or an Apple Mac running Mac OS X would highly favor Apple.
Also, would this open any doors for, say, Sony and/or HP to license and sell the “Apple Mac by HP” and/or the “Apple Mac by Sony” similarly to the “Apple iPod by HP?” Or would Apple ensure that Mac OS X would only run on Apple Macs?
Finally, with Apple less dependent on Mac hardware sales thanks to iPod, could this be the equivalent of Steve Jobs loading the “Mac OS X for x86” hydrogen bomb onto a bomber bound for Redmond? “Mac OS X for x86,” as in, buy it for $129 and load it onto your Dell or whatever instead of the stripped-down Windows XP SP3 currently code-named Longhorn? Moo.
Related MacDailyNews articles:
MacDailyNews to present live Steve Jobs’ WWDC Keynote coverage – June 06, 2005
Intel Inside Apple Macs? – June 04, 2005
Intel in Macs?! How’s Apple CEO Steve Jobs going to spin that switch? – June 04, 2005
Anticipation, rumors build ahead of Apple CEO Steve Jobs’ June 6 WWDC keynote – May 27, 2005
Intel Exec: ‘We will never give up on Apple, we covet them as a design win’ – June 03, 2005
Apple really talking to Intel about WiMAX, not PowerPC to Intel processor switch – June 02, 2005
Intel CEO Otellini: If you want security now, buy a Macintosh instead of a Wintel PC – May 25, 2005
Analysts: No ‘Intel Inside’ stickers on Apple Macs anytime soon – May 24, 2005
Did Apple plant ‘Intel Mac’ rumor to send IBM a message? – May 23, 2005
Analyst: Apple-Intel rumor ‘hogwash’ (today marks 11th month that Jobs’ promised 3GHz G5 is late) – May 23, 2005
Enderle: ‘If Intel gets Apple, it could make Intel look brilliant after the fact’ – May 23, 2005
Stocks extend rally on Apple-Intel report; Dow closes up 52 to 10,524; Nasdaq climbs 10 to 2,057 – May 23, 2005
Apple said to be considering switch to Intel chips for Macs according to Wall Street Journal – May 23, 2005
Apple shares rise on Intel Mac rumors – May 23, 2005
Intel adds FireWire 400 and 800 to latest motherboard – May 18, 2005
iPod success opens door to Mac OS X on Intel – March 04, 2004