Microsoft holds ‘Thought Thieves’ short film competition focusing on intellectual property theft

Microsoft is holding a short film competiton they are calling, “Thought Thieves.” From Microsoft’s web page:

Thought Thieves is about people stealing and profiting from your creation or innovation. Think about it: how would you feel if you saw your hard work being passed off as the property of someone else? What would you do?

We want to know!

Send us your short film on intellectual property theft by 1st July 2005 for your chance to win £2,000 worth of film and video equipment vouchers. And finalists will be invited to attend a special screening of their films and presentation ceremony in London.

More info here.

MacDailyNews Take: How would you feel if you saw your hard work being passed off as the property of someone else? Forget the film contest, why doesn’t Bill Gates just ask Steve Jobs? The first person to enter a screenshot of Apple’s Mac System 7 (circa 1990) desktop flipping horizontally and vertically, then morphing into Windows 95 should get an Oscar.

This is an interesting article: “Microsoft, Apple and Xerox – The History of the Graphical User Interface,” by David K. Every.

Related MacDailyNews articles:
Ars Technica: Apple Computer ‘the most important of the graphical user interface pioneers’ – May 05, 2005
eWEEK Editor Coursey: Longhorn so far ‘looks shockingly like a Macintosh’ – April 25, 2005
Due in late 2006, many of Windows Longhorn’s features have been in Mac OS X since 2001 – April 25, 2005
Apple CEO Steve Jobs on Microsoft’s Longhorn: ‘They are shamelessly copying us’ – April 21, 2005
Microsoft’s Windows Longhorn will bear more than just a passing resemblance to Apple’s Mac OS X – April 15, 2005
Apple’s Schiller: Mac OS X Tiger ‘has created even more distance between us and Microsoft’ – April 13, 2005
Analyst: Tiger proves ‘Apple is light years ahead of Microsoft in developing PC operating systems’ – April 12, 2005
Silicon Valley: Apple CEO Steve Jobs previews ‘Longhorn’ – June 29, 2004
PC Magazine: Microsoft ‘Longhorn’ preview shows ‘an Apple look’ – May 06, 2004
Microsoft concerned that Longhorn’s look and feel will be copied if revealed too soon – August 25, 2003
Windows ‘Longhorn’ to add translucent windows that ripple and shrink by 2005 – May 19, 2003

45 Comments

  1. Strangely enough, if you look in any dictionary for the word “irony” “Microsoft holds ‘Thought Thieves’ short film competition focusing on intellectual property theft” is used as an example.

  2. Bill watched “Roger and Me” and realized that there must be a few Michael Moore types out there who will be gunning for him soon enough. Think of this as a Trojan Horse that will bring many of them out of the woodwork. Gaining knowledge about your enemy is essential to planning a pre-emptive strike. Find out who they are, let them compete to figure out which are the primary threats, gather them all on the same airplane…

    Draw your own conclusions.

  3. speaking of the new Xbox… its confirmed that it runs on power PC chips, the same line of chips used in power macs, however these chips are said to run at 3.2 GHz….. does that mean its possible for the next power mac to run at 3.2 GHz?

  4. The whole idea of science is to build upon others ideas. Why should software be any different? So what if Microsoft took Apples ideas? So what if KDE gets ideas from Windows or Gnome gets ideas from OS X? Thats what drives the industry. If patents start preventing the copying of ideas, the industry will stagnate and die. Why is this acceptable in the software industry yet every other industry builds upon each other’s ideas?

    Both Microsoft and Apple should be ashamed of how they act regarding “intellectual property”. If they didn’t take your code, they didn’t take your “intellectual property.” Grow up the both of you.

    Death to all software patents!

  5. thank you effword…no one understands irony in this country…see alanis morrisette’s “A Little Too Ironic” (or whatever the title is). there are at most 2 ironic things in that song, the rest is bad luck. sorry for the rant.

    microsoft supoorting IP rights…now that’s ironic!

  6. Yawn. Mac zealots rehearsing the same list of perceived injustices as has been chanted for years.

    Change the record.

    Does any of this make software/film/fashion/literary or any other piracy right?

    Care to make an argument in defence of s/w piracy?

    If not, then quit grousing.

  7. Jeff, open source is a great thing, but it doesn’t really apply here. If someone had created an x86 version of the Mac GUI and released it as freeware, I don’t think anyone would have complained. If Apple had sued, they would have been booed as villains. But it’s something else entirely to plagiarize someone’s else concept and sell it for a profit.

  8. Early products that uses windows before Micro$oft in 1985: Xerox’s Star, Tandy’s DeskMate, VisiCorp’s VisiOn, Apple’s Lisa, Quarterdeck’s DesQ, IBM’s TopView, etc.

    Consoles that were created before the Xbox: too many to list (f**king google it)!

    It seems M$ has done little to innovate. Stop the BS!!

  9. “Consoles that were created before the Xbox: too many to list (f**king google it)!

    It seems M$ has done little to innovate. Stop the BS!!”

    Yes, MS did not invent the gaming console, but then again, apple didn’t invent the personal computer.

    Sure Apple made the first market-accepted practical GUI: Macintosh; but then again, MS made the first market-accepted practical Network for inter-console gaming: X-box Live.

    You guys are misusing the word “innovate.” If you have TIGER open your dictionaries. “innovate” does not mean the same thing as “invent”

    Apple innovated the iPod, they did not invent MP3 players. Are you going to say that Apple stole the idea?

    Yes MS has some really shady business practices, but you are choosing really bad examples to make your argument. If you want to talk about stealing, talk about NetScape and IE, not Macintosh and Windows.

  10. Actually, yes, Apple DID invent the personal computer. The Apple I was the first one that was programmable with a keyboard, and which the average person could buy, set up and use.

  11. Anyone reading this ought to be made aware of some facts about Jeremy Reimer:

    Jeremy Reimer doesn’t even have a single degree that is about the field of computer sciences or even a certification in comp. sci. fields (like MCSE).

    He is utterly lacking professional/in-the-trenches experience in computer science as well.

    Yet I see you cited Jeremy Reimer here as somekind of expert in the field of comp. sci.?

    Research who it is you are citing for your own sake.

    Making a ‘sidewalk-surgeon/quack’ out to be an expert in a particular field is just bad business.

    I.E.-> Jeremy Reimer is just another wannabe poseur with no skills period in computer science, who merely scours wikipedia and other sources and spits back already known information.

    This is intelligence? This is being an expert??

    I know not: I could do the same myself and so could you other readers.

    In other words, nothing fundamental or original exists in the lot of his ‘articles’ for arstechnica. This makes complete sense – he is not qualified to do otherwise.

    (His ‘articles’ are mere high-school level termpapers @ best)

    They are written by a charlatan named Jeremy Reimer posing as a computer expert.

    (If this is hard to believe, ask Jeremy Reimer yourself if he has a degree or certification in the field of comp. sci., but more importantly if he has years of actual professional work experience in computer networking, programming, etc. in this field)

    You will see he is nothing more than a wannabe trying to pull the wool over your eyes and come off as some sort of authority in this field when he is anything but that).

    Jeremy Reimer’s just some dunce attempting to create the perception of being a noted authority in the field of computers, with no noted accomplishments in this field, other than writing articles for the playpen arstechnica because he is a forums member there.

    You don’t see the likes of IBM, Microsoft, or any known/respected companies in the field of computers citing Jeremy Reimer do you? This is because they know better.

    Reimer is completely lacking in education, professional experience, & skills is why and this is why he is only capable of being ‘published’ @ arstechnica. This ought to make you question their expertise & judgement as to who is an expert author as well!

    That alone should make you think twice before citing him as somekind of expert.

  12. Jeremy Reimer has no degree or certifications in computers and no professional hands on years to decades of experience in them either.

    Jeremy Reimer was caught email harassing, impersonating, & bothering others online needlessly. That ended up having Jeremy Reimer’s website have portions removed and his friends that helped him in it (a Mr. Jay Little of Atlanta Ga. USA) had their websites removed in their entirety. See here for that:

    http://www.windowsitpro.com/articles/index.cfm?articleid=41095&cpage=212#feedbackAnchor

    Also, others from educational institutions where actual professional journalism & writing are taught, are questioning Jeremy Reimer’s validity & credibility as a writer, period, here:

    http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/node/933

    All Reimer does is spit back what others wrote already anyhow. He is an ambulance chaser at best. A mere “hack” reporter.

    Jeremy Reimer and his friends were also caught here:

    http://www.windowsitpro.com/articles/index.cfm?articleid=41095&cpage=213#feedbackAnchor

    Posting as others (i.e. same person posting under multiple names/guises/nicks/handles) along with his friend Jay Little above to “support one another” when they were found SO technically inacurrate, they were laughed off that site and both of them outright left & that was after law enforcement were called on them both. Windows IT Pro is a widely read publication in the field of computers.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.